Robinson Katherine M, Arbuthnott Katherine D, Rose Danica, McCarron Michelle C, Globa Carin A, Phonexay Sylvia D
Department of Psychology, University of Regina, Regina, Sask., Canada S4S 0A2.
J Exp Child Psychol. 2006 Mar;93(3):224-38. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2005.09.002. Epub 2005 Oct 21.
Age-related changes in children's performance on simple division problems (e.g., 6/2, 72/9) were investigated by asking children in Grades 4 through 7 to solve 32 simple division problems. Differences in performance were found across grade, with younger children performing more slowly and less accurately than older children. Problem size effects were also found in that children were faster and more accurate on small problems than on large problems. Two strategies changed across age, with children in Grade 4 relying heavily on the strategy of "addition" (adding the divisor until the dividend was reached) to solve the problems and children in Grades 5 through 7 relying primarily on the strategy of "multiplication" (recasting the division problem as a multiplication problem) to solve the problems. Surprisingly, the frequency of direct retrieval (retrieving the answer directly from memory) did not increase across grade and never became the dominant strategy of choice. Reasons for why retrieval use remains infrequent and age invariant are discussed. Overall, the results suggest that division is a unique operation and that the continued study of division may have implications for further understanding of how procedural and conceptual knowledge of arithmetic develops.
通过让四年级到七年级的学生解答32道简单除法问题(如6÷2、72÷9),研究了儿童在简单除法问题上与年龄相关的表现变化。结果发现各年级在表现上存在差异,年龄较小的儿童比年龄较大的儿童解题速度更慢且准确性更低。还发现了问题大小效应,即儿童解答小问题比大问题速度更快且更准确。两种策略随年龄变化,四年级的儿童严重依赖“加法”策略(不断加上除数直到得到被除数)来解题,而五年级到七年级的儿童主要依靠“乘法”策略(将除法问题转化为乘法问题)来解题。令人惊讶的是,直接检索(直接从记忆中获取答案)的频率并没有随年级增加,且从未成为主要的首选策略。文中讨论了检索使用频率仍然较低且与年龄无关的原因。总体而言,结果表明除法是一种独特的运算,对除法的持续研究可能有助于进一步理解算术的程序性和概念性知识是如何发展的。