Fagginger Auer Marije F, Hickendorff Marian, van Putten Cornelis M
Methodology and Statistics, Institute of Psychology, Leiden University, Leiden, Netherlands.
The Netherlands Association of Universities of Applied Sciences, The Hague, Netherlands.
Front Psychol. 2018 Sep 11;9:1644. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01644. eCollection 2018.
Making adaptive choices between solution strategies is a central element of contemporary mathematics education. However, previous studies signal that students make suboptimal choices between mental and written strategies to solve division problems. In particular, some students of a lower math ability level appear inclined to use mental strategies that lead to lower performance. The current study uses a pretest-training-posttest design to investigate the extent to which these students' choices for written strategies and performance may be increased. Sixth graders of below-average mathematics level ( = 147) participated in one of two training conditions: an explicit-scaffolding training designed to promote writing down calculations or a practice-only training where strategy use was not explicitly targeted. Written strategy choices and performance increased considerably from pretest to posttest for students in both training conditions, but not in different amounts. Exploratory results suggest that students' strategy choices may also be affected by their attitudes and beliefs and the sociocultural context regarding strategy use.
在解题策略之间做出适应性选择是当代数学教育的核心要素。然而,先前的研究表明,学生在解决除法问题时,在心理策略和书面策略之间做出的选择并不理想。特别是,一些数学能力水平较低的学生似乎倾向于使用导致成绩较低的心理策略。本研究采用前测-训练-后测设计,以调查这些学生对书面策略的选择以及成绩提高的程度。数学水平低于平均水平的六年级学生(n = 147)参加了两种训练条件之一:旨在促进写下计算过程的明确支架式训练,或仅进行练习的训练,其中策略使用未被明确针对。在两种训练条件下,学生从前测到后测的书面策略选择和成绩都有显著提高,但提高幅度不同。探索性结果表明,学生的策略选择也可能受到他们的态度、信念以及关于策略使用的社会文化背景的影响。