Herman C Peter, Polivy Janet
Department of Psychology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada M5S 3G3.
Physiol Behav. 2005 Dec 15;86(5):762-72. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2005.08.064. Epub 2005 Oct 21.
Hunger and satiety have conventionally provided the framework for understanding eating and overeating. We argue that hunger and satiety play a relatively small role in everyday eating. The normative control of food intake refers to the fact that our eating is largely governed by the motive to avoid eating excessively. Dieters impose a restrictive intake norm on themselves, but often violate the norm. Personal norms are individualized rules that people develop to help themselves decide how much is appropriate to eat in a given situation. Situational norms are derived from the eating situation itself; examples include portion size and social influence, which exert powerful effects on intake. We discuss the implications of a normative approach to the analysis of eating and overeating.
传统上,饥饿和饱腹感为理解饮食和暴饮暴食提供了框架。我们认为,饥饿和饱腹感在日常饮食中所起的作用相对较小。食物摄入量的规范控制指的是这样一个事实,即我们的饮食很大程度上受避免过度进食动机的支配。节食者会给自己设定一个限制性的摄入量标准,但他们常常会违反这个标准。个人规范是人们为帮助自己决定在特定情况下吃多少才合适而制定的个性化规则。情境规范源自饮食情境本身;例如份量大小和社会影响,它们对摄入量有强大的影响。我们讨论了规范方法在饮食和暴饮暴食分析中的意义。