Leone Tullia, Pliner Patricia, Peter Herman C
Department of Psychology, University of Toronto, Sidney Smith Hall, 100 St. George Street, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5S 3G3.
Appetite. 2007 Jul;49(1):58-65. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2006.11.005. Epub 2006 Dec 28.
Two studies were conducted in order to examine the conditions under which social norms operate to control people's otherwise prepotent response to maximize eating. The social-normative model of eating assumes that people will follow one of two possible norms for "appropriate" eating behavior: the norm to eat minimally and the norm to avoid eating excessively. In Experiment 1, it was predicted that amounts eaten would be bimodally distributed (with the modes at or just below the two amounts chosen to represent minimal and excessive eating). Instead, most participants ate considerably more than either of the norms presented. Experiment 2 was intended to test the following explanation for these results: exposure to ambiguous norms liberated participants from normative constraints and led them to overeat. Experiment 2 demonstrated that exposure to clear norms in the same situation exerted a braking effect on overeating. We conclude that individuals are more likely to eat in accordance with their own desires when they cannot perceive that others are following a clear pattern of eating behavior and social norms are, therefore, not apparent.
为了探究在何种条件下社会规范会发挥作用,以控制人们原本强烈的进食欲望从而实现进食量最大化,开展了两项研究。进食的社会规范模型假定,人们会遵循两种“适当”进食行为规范中的一种:少食规范和避免过度进食规范。在实验1中,预计进食量会呈双峰分布(峰值处于或略低于代表少食和过度进食的两个量)。然而,大多数参与者的进食量远远超过所呈现的任何一种规范。实验2旨在检验对这些结果的以下解释:接触模糊规范使参与者摆脱了规范约束,导致他们暴饮暴食。实验2表明,在相同情境下接触明确规范对暴饮暴食起到了抑制作用。我们得出结论,当个体无法察觉到他人遵循明确的饮食行为模式且社会规范不明显时,他们更有可能按照自己的欲望进食。