• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

政策冲突:加拿大的基因专利与医疗保健

Policy conflicts: gene patents and health care in Canada.

作者信息

Caulfield Timothy

机构信息

Health Law Institute, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.

出版信息

Community Genet. 2005;8(4):223-7. doi: 10.1159/000087959.

DOI:10.1159/000087959
PMID:16244476
Abstract

Several recent gene patent controversies have energized and refocused the human gene patent debate in Canada. These include the use of the Myriad test for breast cancer by the provinces, patenting of the Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome virus and a recent Supreme Court decision rejecting the patenting of 'higher life forms'. These cases place the emerging policy conflicts between the innovation and commercialization agenda of the government and the desire to provide equitable access to health care in sharp focus. Another challenge faced by Canada is the powerful influence of the United States in policy decisions. Although these issues have raised awareness about the possibility of reforming the patent system, Parliament has yet to consider any of the suggested reforms of the Canadian patent system and there are no formal proposals pending.

摘要

近期的几起基因专利争议激发了加拿大关于人类基因专利辩论,并使其焦点重新聚焦。这些争议包括各省对用于乳腺癌检测的Myriad检测方法的使用、严重急性呼吸综合征病毒的专利申请以及最高法院最近一项驳回“高等生命形式”专利申请的裁决。这些案例将政府创新与商业化议程和提供公平医疗保健服务的愿望之间新出现的政策冲突凸显出来。加拿大面临的另一个挑战是美国在政策决策方面的强大影响力。尽管这些问题提高了人们对改革专利制度可能性的认识,但议会尚未考虑对加拿大专利制度提出的任何改革建议,目前也没有待决的正式提案。

相似文献

1
Policy conflicts: gene patents and health care in Canada.政策冲突:加拿大的基因专利与医疗保健
Community Genet. 2005;8(4):223-7. doi: 10.1159/000087959.
2
Harvard v. Canada: the myc mouse that still squeaks in the maze of biopatent law.哈佛诉加拿大:在生物专利法迷宫中仍吱吱作响的“myc”小鼠。
Acad Med. 2001 Jul;76(7):684-92. doi: 10.1097/00001888-200107000-00007.
3
Myriad and the mass media: the covering of a gene patent controversy.麦利亚德公司与大众媒体:一场基因专利争议的报道
Genet Med. 2007 Dec;9(12):850-5. doi: 10.1097/gim.0b013e31815bf965.
4
The gene patent controversy on Twitter: a case study of Twitter users' responses to the CHEO lawsuit against Long QT gene patents.推特上的基因专利争议:推特用户对 CHEO 起诉长 QT 基因专利案回应的案例研究
BMC Med Ethics. 2015 Aug 25;16:55. doi: 10.1186/s12910-015-0049-1.
5
Patenting genes: what does Association for Molecular Pathology v. Myriad Genetics mean for genetic testing and research?基因专利:“分子病理学协会诉麦利亚德基因公司案”对基因检测和研究意味着什么?
Public Health Rep. 2014 May;129(3):289-92. doi: 10.1177/003335491412900311.
6
Who owns the genome?基因组归谁所有?
New Atlantis. 2006 Winter;11:87-96.
7
Patenting human genes: Chinese academic articles' portrayal of gene patents.人类基因专利:中国学术文章对基因专利的描述
BMC Med Ethics. 2018 Apr 24;19(1):29. doi: 10.1186/s12910-018-0271-8.
8
BRCA patent dispute may head to US Supreme Court.BRCA基因专利纠纷可能会提交至美国最高法院。
Lancet. 2012 Jan 28;379(9813):300. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(12)60127-5.
9
The History of Patenting Genetic Material.专利遗传物质的历史。
Annu Rev Genet. 2015;49:161-82. doi: 10.1146/annurev-genet-112414-054731. Epub 2015 Oct 6.
10
Genetic technologies, health care policy and the patent bargain.
Clin Genet. 2003 Jan;63(1):15-8. doi: 10.1034/j.1399-0004.2003.630103.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Commercial Opportunities and Ethical Pitfalls in Personalized Medicine: A Myriad of Reasons to Revisit the Myriad Genetics Saga.个性化医疗中的商业机遇与道德陷阱:重温Myriad Genetics事件的诸多缘由
Curr Pharmacogenomics Person Med. 2013 Jun;11(2):98-109. doi: 10.2174/1875692111311020003.
2
Evidence and anecdotes: an analysis of human gene patenting controversies.证据与轶事:人类基因专利争议分析
Nat Biotechnol. 2006 Sep;24(9):1091-4. doi: 10.1038/nbt0906-1091.
3
Shifting emphasis from pharmacogenomics to theragnostics.将重点从药物基因组学转向治疗诊断学。
Nat Biotechnol. 2006 Aug;24(8):942-6. doi: 10.1038/nbt0806-942.