Suppr超能文献

佐治亚州两个群体的新生儿听力普遍筛查随访:新生儿、母亲及系统相关因素

Universal newborn hearing screening follow-up in two Georgia populations: newborn, mother and system correlates.

作者信息

Todd N Wendell

机构信息

Emory University, 5455 Meridian Mark Road, Atlanta, GA 30342, USA.

出版信息

Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2006 May;70(5):807-15. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2005.09.019. Epub 2005 Oct 21.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Nearly half of babies who "fail" their newborn hearing screening do not receive appropriate follow-up. Various explanations have been suggested.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate, in two contrasting populations of newborns in Georgia, contemporaneous medical, socio-demographic and screening correlates of follow-up after newborn hearing screening. Three hypotheses were addressed: (1) follow-up correlated with particular medical, social and demographic features; (2) screening performance indicators correlated with follow-up; and (3) screening policies and procedures correlated with follow-up.

METHODS

The studied babies, born July 2001 through June 2003 at Atlanta's Piedmont Hospital and Waycross Health District, had failed screening in both ears. Each site had about 4000 births per year, and a plan for outpatient follow-up of in-patient "fail" babies.

RESULTS

At Piedmont, where Medicaid funded less than 7% of the births, 57% (130/230) had known follow-up to outpatient screening. In contrast, at Waycross, where Medicaid funded 89.6% of the births, 100% (38/38) had follow-up. The first study hypothesis was only partially supported by the data-from Piedmont, but not Waycross. White race and maternal age 30 years or older correlated with following-up: odds ratios 2.07 (95% CI 1.17, 3.68) and 1.83 (1.05, 3.17), respectively. Private health insurance and marriage trended with following-up. Follow-up rates did not correlate with the rates of screening refusal, missed screening and "fail" rates. Follow-up was unrelated to mothers witnessing the screening, receiving in-person explanations and having appointments arranged for them. The Piedmont and Waycross programs were quite different. Piedmont's began in 2001, mothers typically learned about screening when it was done and "fail" babies were reported to many public health entities. In contrast, the Waycross program was more than 20 years old, prenatal care included teaching about screening and reporting was to one public health entity.

CONCLUSIONS

Though maternal socio-demographic features (poor, non-white, young) and access problems have been considered factors for non-follow-up, this study found two program characteristics most important: the lack of prenatal education about newborn hearing screening, and the lack of functionally integrated hospital hearing information with Public Health.

摘要

背景

在新生儿听力筛查“未通过”的婴儿中,近一半未得到适当的随访。对此有多种解释。

目的

在佐治亚州两个形成对比的新生儿群体中,调查新生儿听力筛查后随访的同期医疗、社会人口统计学及筛查相关因素。探讨了三个假设:(1)随访与特定的医疗、社会和人口特征相关;(2)筛查性能指标与随访相关;(3)筛查政策和程序与随访相关。

方法

研究对象为2001年7月至2003年6月在亚特兰大的皮埃蒙特医院和韦克罗斯健康区出生且双耳听力筛查未通过的婴儿。每个地点每年约有4000例分娩,且有针对住院“未通过”婴儿的门诊随访计划。

结果

在皮埃蒙特医院,医疗补助仅为不到7%的分娩提供资金,57%(130/230)的婴儿接受了门诊筛查随访。相比之下,在韦克罗斯,医疗补助为89.6%的分娩提供资金,100%(38/38)的婴儿接受了随访。第一项研究假设仅在皮埃蒙特的数据中得到部分支持,韦克罗斯的数据则未支持。白人种族以及母亲年龄30岁及以上与随访相关:优势比分别为2.07(95%可信区间1.17,3.68)和1.83(1.05,3.17)。私人健康保险和婚姻状况与随访呈趋势性相关。随访率与筛查拒绝率、漏筛率及“未通过”率无关。随访与母亲是否目睹筛查、是否接受当面解释以及是否为她们安排预约无关。皮埃蒙特和韦克罗斯的项目差异很大。皮埃蒙特的项目始于2001年,母亲们通常在筛查进行时才得知此事,“未通过”的婴儿会被报告给多个公共卫生机构。相比之下,韦克罗斯的项目已有20多年历史,产前护理包括有关筛查的教学内容,报告仅提交给一个公共卫生机构。

结论

尽管母亲的社会人口统计学特征(贫困、非白人、年轻)及获取医疗服务的问题被认为是未进行随访的因素,但本研究发现两个最重要的项目特征:缺乏关于新生儿听力筛查的产前教育,以及医院听力信息与公共卫生部门缺乏功能整合。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验