Morris L, Delassus P, Callanan A, Walsh M, Wallis F, Grace P, McGloughlin T
Centre for Applied Biomedical Engineering Research, Dept. Mechanical & Aeronautical Eng. and Material and Surface Science Institute, University of Limerick, Castletroy, Limerick, Ireland.
J Biomech Eng. 2005 Oct;127(5):767-75. doi: 10.1115/1.1992521.
A Spiral Computerized Tomography (CT) scan of the aorta were obtained from a single subject and three model variations were examined. Computational fluid dynamics modeling of all three models showed variations in the velocity contours along the aortic arch with differences in the boundary layer growth and recirculation regions. Further down-stream, all three models showed very similar velocity profiles during maximum velocity with differences occurring in the decelerating part of the pulse. Flow patterns obtained from transient 3-D computational fluid dynamics are influenced by different reconstruction methods and the pulsatility of the flow. Caution is required when analyzing models based on CT scans.
从一名受试者获取了主动脉的螺旋计算机断层扫描(CT)图像,并对三种模型变体进行了检查。对所有三种模型的计算流体动力学建模显示,沿主动脉弓的速度等值线存在变化,边界层生长和再循环区域存在差异。在更下游的位置,所有三种模型在最大速度时显示出非常相似的速度分布,差异出现在脉搏的减速部分。从瞬态三维计算流体动力学获得的流动模式受不同重建方法和流动脉动性的影响。在分析基于CT扫描的模型时需要谨慎。