Takase Yasushi, Kishigami Hitoshi, Nakano Misa, Tatsumi Chikao
Department of Neurology, Toyonaka Municipal Hospital.
Rinsho Shinkeigaku. 2005 Sep;45(9):629-33.
To evaluate the long-term prognosis of analgesics abuse headache.
Ninety-five consecutive patients with analgesics abuse headache were treated in Toyonaka Municipal Hospital. Seventy-three patients (76.8%) had migraine, eighteen (19.0%) had tension-type headache and four (4.2%) new daily persistent headache. Seventy-seven (81.1%) were females and eighteen (18.9%) males. All patients were treated for six years from November 1997 to October 2003 and a total of sixty-nine patients were available for interview as of October 2004 at a mean time interval of 41.5 months after drug withdrawal therapy. Twenty-two patients were admitted to our inpatient withdrawal unit, twenty-five patients were treated by outpatient withdrawal therapy. Tapering analgesics gradually in conjunction with instituting preventive therapy treated twenty-two patients.
Inpatient-Nine cases (41%) reported intake of analgesics on < or = 8 days/month, five cases (23%) on 9-15 days/month and eight cases (36%) > 15 days/month. Three cases (14%) developed recurrent analgesic abuse. Outpatient (abrupt discontinuation)--Twelve cases (48%) reported intake of analgesics on < or = 8 days/month, five cases (20%) on 9-15 days/month and eight cases (32%) >15 days/month. One case (4%) reported on recurrent analgesic abuse. Outpatient (tapering analgesics gradually)--One case (5%) reported intake of analgesics on < or = 8 days/month and twenty-one cases (95%) reported daily intake. Fifteen cases (68%) reported continuous analgesic abuse. Comparison between migraine and tension-type headache suggested that patients with migraine showed a tendency towards a better prognosis than patients with tension-type headache.
These results demonstrate the efficacy of withdrawal treatment in difficult cases suffering from analgesics abuse headache. If patients cannot be safely or adequately treated as outpatients, inpatient treatment may be needed.
评估镇痛药滥用性头痛的长期预后。
丰中市立医院连续收治了95例镇痛药滥用性头痛患者。其中73例(76.8%)为偏头痛,18例(19.0%)为紧张型头痛,4例(4.2%)为新发性每日持续性头痛。77例(81.1%)为女性,18例(18.9%)为男性。所有患者从1997年11月至2003年10月接受了6年的治疗,截至2004年10月,共有69例患者可供访谈,平均停药治疗后时间间隔为41.5个月。22例患者入住我院住院戒毒病房,25例患者接受门诊戒毒治疗。22例患者通过逐渐减少镇痛药用量并同时进行预防性治疗。
住院患者——9例(41%)报告每月服用镇痛药≤8天,5例(23%)报告每月服用9 - 15天,8例(36%)报告每月服用>15天。3例(14%)出现复发性镇痛药滥用。门诊患者(突然停药)——12例(48%)报告每月服用镇痛药≤8天,5例(20%)报告每月服用9 - 15天,8例(32%)报告每月服用>15天。1例(4%)报告复发性镇痛药滥用。门诊患者(逐渐减少镇痛药用量)——1例(5%)报告每月服用镇痛药≤8天,21例(95%)报告每日服用。15例(68%)报告持续滥用镇痛药。偏头痛与紧张型头痛的比较表明,偏头痛患者的预后倾向于比紧张型头痛患者更好。
这些结果证明了戒毒治疗在镇痛药滥用性头痛疑难病例中的疗效。如果患者作为门诊患者不能得到安全或充分的治疗,可能需要住院治疗。