Gesi Andrea, Raffaelli Ornella, Goracci Cecilia, Pashley David H, Tay Franklin R, Ferrari Marco
Department of Restorative Dentistry and Dental Materials, University of Siena, Italy.
J Endod. 2005 Nov;31(11):809-13. doi: 10.1097/01.don.0000158230.15853.b7.
Strengthening of Resilon-filled roots via an adhesive interface should be reflected by improvement in the interfacial strength and dislocation resistance between the root fillings and intraradicular dentin. This study compared the interfacial strengths of Resilon/Epiphany and gutta-percha/AH Plus using a thin-slice push-out test design. Failure modes of root slices after push-out testing were examined with environmental scanning electron microscopy. The gutta-percha group exhibited significantly higher interfacial strength than the Resilon group, when premature failures that occurred in Resilon root slices were included in the statistical analysis. The gutta-percha root slices failed exclusively along the gutta-percha/sealer interface. The Resilon root slices failed predominantly along the sealer/dentin interface with recognizable, fractured resin tags. Detachment of the Resilon from the Epiphany sealer was also surprisingly observed in some specimens. The similarly low interfacial strengths achieved with both types of root filling challenges the concept of strengthening root-filled teeth with the new endodontic material.
通过粘结界面增强含Resilon的根管应体现在根管充填物与根管内牙本质之间的界面强度和抗脱位性的提高上。本研究采用薄片推出试验设计比较了Resilon/Epiphany和牙胶/AH Plus的界面强度。推出试验后,用环境扫描电子显微镜检查根管切片的失效模式。当将Resilon根管切片中发生的过早失效纳入统计分析时,牙胶组的界面强度显著高于Resilon组。牙胶根管切片仅沿牙胶/封闭剂界面失效。Resilon根管切片主要沿封闭剂/牙本质界面失效,带有可识别的断裂树脂标签。在一些标本中还令人惊讶地观察到Resilon与Epiphany封闭剂分离。两种类型的根管充填物所获得的类似低界面强度对用新型牙髓材料增强根管治疗牙齿的概念提出了挑战。