• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

四种封闭剂的管腔渗透深度和适应性:扫描电子显微镜研究。

The Tubular Penetration Depth and Adaption of Four Sealers: A Scanning Electron Microscopic Study.

机构信息

Shenzhen Stomatological Hospital, Southern Medical University, Shenzhen 518000, China.

Department of Stomatology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510000, China.

出版信息

Biomed Res Int. 2017;2017:2946524. doi: 10.1155/2017/2946524. Epub 2017 Dec 31.

DOI:10.1155/2017/2946524
PMID:29479539
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5804396/
Abstract

The tubular penetration and adaptation of the sealer are important factors for successful root canal filling. The aim of this study was to evaluate the tubular penetration depth of four different sealers in the coronal, middle, and apical third of root canals as well as the adaptation of these sealers to root canal walls. 50 single-rooted teeth were prepared in this study. Forty-eight of them were filled with different sealers (Cortisomol, iRoot SP, AH-Plus, and RealSeal SE) and respective core filling materials. Then the specimens were sectioned and scanning electron microscopy was employed to assess the tubular penetration and adaptation of the sealers. . Our results demonstrated that the maximum penetration was exhibited by RealSeal SE, followed by AH-Plus, iRoot SP, and Cortisomol. As regards the adaptation property to root canal walls, AH-Plus has best adaptation capacity followed by iRoot SP, RealSeal SE, and Cortisomol. . The tubular penetration and adaptation vary with the different sealers investigated. RealSeal SE showed the most optimal tubular penetration, whereas AH-Plus presented the best adaptation to the root canal walls.

摘要

根管的贯穿和封闭剂的适应是根管充填成功的重要因素。本研究的目的是评估 4 种不同根管封闭剂在根管冠、中、根尖 3 区的根管贯穿深度以及这些封闭剂对根管壁的适应情况。本研究共预备了 50 颗单根牙。其中 48 颗牙用不同的封闭剂(Cortisomol、iRoot SP、AH-Plus 和 RealSeal SE)和相应的核填充材料进行填充。然后将标本进行切片,采用扫描电子显微镜评估封闭剂的根管贯穿和适应情况。结果表明,RealSeal SE 的最大贯穿深度最大,其次是 AH-Plus、iRoot SP 和 Cortisomol。至于对根管壁的适应能力,AH-Plus 的适应能力最好,其次是 iRoot SP、RealSeal SE 和 Cortisomol。不同的封闭剂根管的贯穿和适应情况不同。RealSeal SE 表现出最佳的根管贯穿效果,而 AH-Plus 对根管壁的适应能力最好。

相似文献

1
The Tubular Penetration Depth and Adaption of Four Sealers: A Scanning Electron Microscopic Study.四种封闭剂的管腔渗透深度和适应性:扫描电子显微镜研究。
Biomed Res Int. 2017;2017:2946524. doi: 10.1155/2017/2946524. Epub 2017 Dec 31.
2
Sealer penetration and adaptation in the dentinal tubules: a scanning electron microscopic study.牙本质小管内的封闭剂渗透和适应性:扫描电子显微镜研究。
J Endod. 2011 Nov;37(11):1576-9. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2011.07.005. Epub 2011 Sep 15.
3
Dentinal tubule penetration of AH Plus, iRoot SP, MTA fillapex, and guttaflow bioseal root canal sealers after different final irrigation procedures: A confocal microscopic study.不同最终冲洗程序后AH Plus、iRoot SP、MTA fillapex和guttaflow生物封闭根管封闭剂对牙本质小管的渗透:一项共聚焦显微镜研究。
Lasers Surg Med. 2016 Jan;48(1):70-6. doi: 10.1002/lsm.22446. Epub 2016 Jan 12.
4
Evaluation of interfacial adaptation and penetration of bioceramic-based sealers in oval root canals: A confocal laser scanning microscope study.评价基于生物陶瓷的封闭剂在椭圆形根管中的界面适应性和渗透性:激光共聚焦扫描显微镜研究。
Microsc Res Tech. 2023 Jul;86(7):754-761. doi: 10.1002/jemt.24323. Epub 2023 Apr 20.
5
Comparison of dentin penetration ability of different root canal sealers used with different obturation methods.比较不同根管封闭剂在不同充填方法下的牙本质渗透性。
Microsc Res Tech. 2020 Dec;83(12):1544-1551. doi: 10.1002/jemt.23548. Epub 2020 Jul 31.
6
Depth of penetration of four resin sealers into radicular dentinal tubules: a confocal microscopic study.四种树脂密封剂在根管牙本质小管中的渗透深度:共聚焦显微镜研究。
J Endod. 2012 Oct;38(10):1412-6. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2012.05.017. Epub 2012 Jul 10.
7
Assessment of Marginal Adaptation and Sealing Ability of Root Canal Sealers: An in vitro Study.根管封闭剂边缘适应性和封闭能力的评估:一项体外研究
J Contemp Dent Pract. 2017 Dec 1;18(12):1130-1134. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-2188.
8
Interface of dentine to root canal sealers.牙本质与根管封闭剂的界面。
J Dent. 2014 Mar;42(3):336-50. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2013.11.013. Epub 2013 Nov 25.
9
Evaluation of the filling ability of artificial lateral canals using calcium silicate-based and epoxy resin-based endodontic sealers and two gutta-percha filling techniques.评价基于硅酸钙和基于环氧树脂的根管封闭剂以及两种牙胶尖充填技术对侧支根管的充填能力。
Int Endod J. 2016 Apr;49(4):365-73. doi: 10.1111/iej.12454. Epub 2015 Apr 21.
10
Comparison of Three Final Irrigation Activation Techniques: Effects on Canal Cleanness, Smear Layer Removal, and Dentinal Tubule Penetration of Two Root Canal Sealers.三种最终冲洗激活技术的比较:对两种根管封闭剂的根管清洁度、玷污层去除及牙本质小管渗透的影响
Photomed Laser Surg. 2017 Dec;35(12):672-681. doi: 10.1089/pho.2016.4234. Epub 2017 Feb 22.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluation of the tubular penetration of two different types of nanoparticle root canal sealers over apically separated files: a scanning electron microscopic study (in vitro study).两种不同类型的纳米颗粒根管封闭剂在根尖分离锉上的根管渗透评估:一项扫描电子显微镜研究(体外研究)。
BMC Oral Health. 2025 Jun 3;25(1):887. doi: 10.1186/s12903-025-06263-0.
2
Comparative Micro-CT Evaluation of Dentinal Tubule Penetration of BIO-C and AH Plus Jet Root Canal Sealer Using Three Intra-Canal Activation Techniques.使用三种根管内激活技术对BIO-C和AH Plus Jet根管封闭剂牙本质小管渗透的比较显微CT评估
J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2024 Dec;16(Suppl 5):S4568-S4571. doi: 10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_1242_24. Epub 2025 Jan 30.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Solubility and pH of bioceramic root canal sealers: A comparative study.生物陶瓷根管封闭剂的溶解度和pH值:一项对比研究。
J Clin Exp Dent. 2017 Oct 1;9(10):e1189-e1194. doi: 10.4317/jced.54040. eCollection 2017 Oct.
2
Marginal adaptation of newer root canal sealers to dentin: A SEM study.新型根管封闭剂与牙本质的边缘适应性:一项扫描电子显微镜研究。
J Conserv Dent. 2016 Jul-Aug;19(4):360-3. doi: 10.4103/0972-0707.186453.
3
Retreatability of Root Canals Obturated Using Gutta-Percha with Bioceramic, MTA and Resin-Based Sealers.使用牙胶与生物陶瓷、MTA及树脂类封闭剂充填的根管的再治疗性能
Comparative Evaluation of Sealing Ability, Bond Strength, and Antimicrobial Properties of Endodontic Sealers: An Study.
根管封闭剂的封闭能力、粘结强度和抗菌性能的比较评价:一项研究。
J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2024 Dec;16(Suppl 4):S3942-S3944. doi: 10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_1110_24. Epub 2024 Dec 12.
4
Comparison of Different Obturation Techniques in the Dentinal Tubule Penetration of EndoSequence® Bioceramic Sealer HiFlow™: An In-Vitro Study.不同封闭技术在内填式EndoSequence®生物陶瓷封闭剂HiFlow™牙本质小管渗透中的比较:一项体外研究
Cureus. 2024 Oct 9;16(10):e71155. doi: 10.7759/cureus.71155. eCollection 2024 Oct.
5
Effect of collagen cross-linking agents on the depth of penetration of bioceramic sealer and release of hydroxyproline: An study.胶原蛋白交联剂对生物陶瓷封闭剂渗透深度及羟脯氨酸释放的影响:一项研究。
J Conserv Dent Endod. 2024 Feb;27(2):170-174. doi: 10.4103/jcd.jcd_309_23. Epub 2024 Feb 8.
6
Comparative evaluation of dentinal tubule penetration and push-out bond strength of new injectable hydraulic calcium disilicate based root canal sealer: A single blinded in vitro study.新型可注射水硬性硅酸钙基根管封闭剂牙本质小管渗透及推出粘结强度的比较评价:一项单盲体外研究。
J Oral Biol Craniofac Res. 2024 Mar-Apr;14(2):143-151. doi: 10.1016/j.jobcr.2024.01.009. Epub 2024 Feb 5.
7
Calcium Silicate-Based Sealer Dentinal Tubule Penetration-A Systematic Review of In Vitro Studies.基于硅酸钙的封闭剂对牙本质小管的渗透——体外研究的系统评价
Materials (Basel). 2023 Mar 29;16(7):2734. doi: 10.3390/ma16072734.
8
Dislodgment Resistance, Adhesive Pattern, and Dentinal Tubule Penetration of a Novel Experimental Algin Biopolymer-Incorporated Bioceramic-Based Root Canal Sealer.新型含藻酸盐生物聚合物的生物陶瓷基根管封闭剂的抗移位性、黏附模式及牙本质小管渗透情况
Polymers (Basel). 2023 Mar 6;15(5):1317. doi: 10.3390/polym15051317.
9
Effect of the Modified Methacrylate-Based Root Canal Sealer in Single-Cone Technique.改良甲基丙烯酸酯类根管封闭剂在单锥技术中的效果
Nanomaterials (Basel). 2022 Oct 23;12(21):3722. doi: 10.3390/nano12213722.
10
Intratubular penetration capacity of HiFlow bioceramic sealer used with warm obturation techniques and single cone: A confocal laser scanning microscopic study.采用热牙胶充填技术和单尖法时HiFlow生物陶瓷封闭剂的根管内渗透能力:一项共聚焦激光扫描显微镜研究
Heliyon. 2022 Aug 27;8(9):e10388. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e10388. eCollection 2022 Sep.
Iran Endod J. 2015;10(2):93-8. Epub 2015 Mar 18.
4
Microleakage in endodontics.牙髓病学中的微渗漏
J Int Oral Health. 2014 Nov-Dec;6(6):99-104.
5
3D analyses of interface voids in root canals filled with different sealer materials in combination with warm gutta-percha technique.采用热牙胶技术,对不同封闭剂材料充填的根管内界面空隙进行三维分析。
Clin Oral Investig. 2014 Jan;18(1):155-61. doi: 10.1007/s00784-013-0970-y. Epub 2013 Mar 24.
6
Resistance to fracture of roots filled with different sealers.不同封闭剂填充根管的抗折性能。
Dent Mater J. 2012;31(4):528-32.
7
Interfacial adaptation of an epoxy-resin sealer and a self-etch sealer to root canal dentin using the System B or the single cone technique.使用System B或单尖技术时,环氧树脂封闭剂和自酸蚀封闭剂与根管牙本质的界面适应性。
Braz Dent J. 2012;23(3):205-11. doi: 10.1590/s0103-64402012000300004.
8
Influence of prior 810-nm-diode intracanal laser irradiation on hydrophilic resin-based sealer obturation.810nm 半导体激光照射对水门汀类根管封闭剂的影响。
Braz Oral Res. 2012 Jul-Aug;26(4):323-9. doi: 10.1590/s1806-83242012005000010. Epub 2012 Jun 19.
9
The effect of calcium silicate-based sealer on the push-out bond strength of fibre posts.硅酸钙基封剂对纤维桩推出粘结强度的影响。
Aust Dent J. 2012 Jun;57(2):166-70. doi: 10.1111/j.1834-7819.2012.01671.x. Epub 2012 Mar 27.
10
A SEM evaluation of dentinal adaptation of root canal obturation with GuttaFlow and conventional obturating material.使用GuttaFlow和传统充填材料进行根管充填后牙本质适应性的扫描电子显微镜评估。
Indian J Dent Res. 2011 Nov-Dec;22(6):881. doi: 10.4103/0970-9290.94696.