Jaganath Bharath Makonahalli, Rudranaik Sandeep, Krishnegowda Sahadev Chickmagarvalli, Nirmala K B, Nagashetty Yoganatha Hanasoge
Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Sri Hasanamba Dental College and Hospital, Hasan, Karnataka, India.
J Conserv Dent Endod. 2024 Jun;27(6):608-612. doi: 10.4103/JCDE.JCDE_186_24. Epub 2024 Jun 6.
This research aimed to assess the push-out bond strength (PBS) to dentin of three distinct obturation materials inside the root canal and identify the failure mechanism.
The research used 30 undamaged human mandibular premolars. The specimens were randomly assigned to three groups, each employing a different sealer ( = 10). Group 1 used AH Plus sealer, Group 2 used GuttaFlow-2 sealer, and Group 3 used bioceramic sealer (CeraSeal). The obturation procedure was performed utilizing the single-cone method with gutta-percha. The specimens were divided into sections and loaded using a universal testing machine. Following PBS testing, every sample underwent a stereomicroscope examination, and the specific failure mechanism was documented.
The average PBS was greatest for AH Plus, followed by CeraSeal and Guttaflow-2. Notable disparities existed between the coronal and apical levels.
AH Plus exhibited superior PBS qualities to root dentin compared to other sealers.
本研究旨在评估三种不同根管充填材料与牙本质之间的推出粘结强度(PBS),并确定失败机制。
本研究使用了30颗未受损的人类下颌前磨牙。将标本随机分为三组,每组使用不同的封闭剂(n = 10)。第1组使用AH Plus封闭剂,第2组使用GuttaFlow-2封闭剂,第3组使用生物陶瓷封闭剂(CeraSeal)。采用单尖法使用牙胶进行充填操作。将标本切成小块,并用万能试验机加载。在进行PBS测试后,对每个样本进行体视显微镜检查,并记录具体的失败机制。
AH Plus的平均PBS最高,其次是CeraSeal和Guttaflow-2。冠部和根尖部水平之间存在显著差异。
与其他封闭剂相比,AH Plus对牙根牙本质表现出更好的PBS性能。