Covington Herbert E, Miczek Klaus A
Department of Psychology, Tufts University, 530 Boston Ave. (Bacon Hall), Medford, MA 02155, USA.
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2005 Dec;183(3):331-40. doi: 10.1007/s00213-005-0190-5. Epub 2005 Oct 25.
An intense stress response characterizes both the dominant and submissive individuals during an aggressive confrontation, and these stress responses have enduring neural and behavioral consequences.
In spite of similar glucocorticoid and corticolimbic dopamine activation, dominant and defeated individuals appear to diverge in terms of their drug taking. Do rats that are intermittently subjected to defeat stress become more sensitized to cocaine taking relative to rats that engage in aggressive bouts?
Separate groups of male Long-Evans rats were investigated after an initial 10-day period with four brief episodes of social defeat (intruders) or aggressive behavior (residents): (1) the corticosterone responses to the very first and the last confrontations were measured; (2) the locomotor response to an amphetamine (1 mg/kg) challenge 10 days after the last stress exposure served as an index of behavioral sensitization; (3) intravenous self-administration sessions assessed the reinforcing effects of 0.75 mg/kg/infusion cocaine when available after every fifth response (fixed ratio), when delivered after completing progressively more demanding response requirements (progressive ratio; 0.3 mg/kg/infusion), and when available during a 24-h binge of continuous access (0.3 mg/kg/infusion).
Both social defeat of the intruder rat and attack behavior by the resident rat rapidly increased plasma levels of corticosterone after the first and last aggressive confrontation, indicating no habituation to these types of stress. Intermittent social defeat engenders a sensitized locomotor response to a 1 mg/kg amphetamine challenge and increases cocaine self-administration as indicated by more behavioral effort to obtain cocaine infusions and by accumulating more cocaine during 24 h of continuous access (binge). By contrast, experiences with aggressive behavior do not impact on the motorically activating and reinforcing effects of stimulant administrations.
The closely similar corticosterone activation in dominant and subordinate rats, followed by divergent patterns of cocaine self-administration indicates that different forms of social stress have dissociable effects on cocaine taking.
在攻击性对抗中,占主导地位和处于从属地位的个体都会表现出强烈的应激反应,而且这些应激反应会产生持久的神经和行为后果。
尽管糖皮质激素和皮质边缘多巴胺的激活情况相似,但占主导地位和战败的个体在药物摄取方面似乎存在差异。相对于进行攻击性行为的大鼠,间歇性遭受战败应激的大鼠对可卡因摄取是否更敏感?
将雄性Long-Evans大鼠分为不同组,在最初的10天内经历四次短暂的社会战败(入侵者)或攻击性行为(常住者):(1)测量首次和最后一次对抗时的皮质酮反应;(2)在最后一次应激暴露10天后,对苯丙胺(1毫克/千克)激发的运动反应作为行为敏化的指标;(3)静脉自我给药实验评估了每五次反应(固定比率)后可获得的0.75毫克/千克/注射可卡因的强化效果,在完成逐渐增加的反应要求(累进比率;0.3毫克/千克/注射)后给予可卡因时的强化效果,以及在24小时连续获取(0.3毫克/千克/注射)期间可获得可卡因时的强化效果。
入侵者大鼠的社会战败和常住者大鼠的攻击行为在首次和最后一次攻击性对抗后均迅速提高了血浆皮质酮水平,表明对这些类型的应激没有产生习惯化。间歇性社会战败会导致对1毫克/千克苯丙胺激发产生敏化的运动反应,并增加可卡因自我给药,表现为获取可卡因注射所需的行为努力增加,以及在24小时连续获取(暴饮暴食)期间积累更多可卡因。相比之下,攻击性行为的经历不会影响兴奋剂给药的运动激活和强化效果。
占主导地位和从属地位的大鼠中皮质酮激活情况非常相似,但随后可卡因自我给药模式不同,这表明不同形式的社会应激对可卡因摄取有可分离的影响。