Diedrichsen Jörn, Hashambhoy Yasmin, Rane Tushar, Shadmehr Reza
Department of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland 21205, USA.
J Neurosci. 2005 Oct 26;25(43):9919-31. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1874-05.2005.
Reach errors may be broadly classified into errors arising from unpredictable changes in target location, called target errors, and errors arising from miscalibration of internal models (e.g., when prisms alter visual feedback or a force field alters limb dynamics), called execution errors. Execution errors may be caused by miscalibration of dynamics (e.g., when a force field alters limb dynamics) or by miscalibration of kinematics (e.g., when prisms alter visual feedback). Although all types of errors lead to similar on-line corrections, we found that the motor system showed strong trial-by-trial adaptation in response to random execution errors but not in response to random target errors. We used functional magnetic resonance imaging and a compatible robot to study brain regions involved in processing each kind of error. Both kinematic and dynamic execution errors activated regions along the central and the postcentral sulci and in lobules V, VI, and VIII of the cerebellum, making these areas possible sites of plastic changes in internal models for reaching. Only activity related to kinematic errors extended into parietal area 5. These results are inconsistent with the idea that kinematics and dynamics of reaching are computed in separate neural entities. In contrast, only target errors caused increased activity in the striatum and the posterior superior parietal lobule. The cerebellum and motor cortex were as strongly activated as with execution errors. These findings indicate a neural and behavioral dissociation between errors that lead to switching of behavioral goals and errors that lead to adaptation of internal models of limb dynamics and kinematics.
一类是由目标位置不可预测的变化引起的误差,称为目标误差;另一类是由内部模型校准错误(例如,当棱镜改变视觉反馈或力场改变肢体动力学时)引起的误差,称为执行误差。执行误差可能是由动力学校准错误(例如,当力场改变肢体动力学时)或运动学校准错误(例如,当棱镜改变视觉反馈时)引起的。尽管所有类型的误差都会导致类似的在线校正,但我们发现运动系统在响应随机执行误差时表现出强烈的逐次试验适应性,而在响应随机目标误差时则没有。我们使用功能磁共振成像和一个兼容的机器人来研究参与处理每种误差的脑区。运动学和动力学执行误差均激活了中央沟和中央后沟沿线以及小脑的V、VI和VIII小叶中的区域,使这些区域成为伸展内部模型中可能发生塑性变化的部位。只有与运动学误差相关的活动延伸到顶叶5区。这些结果与伸展的运动学和动力学在不同神经实体中计算的观点不一致。相比之下,只有目标误差会导致纹状体和后上顶叶小叶的活动增加。小脑和运动皮层的激活程度与执行误差时一样强烈。这些发现表明,导致行为目标切换的误差与导致肢体动力学和运动学内部模型适应的误差之间存在神经和行为上的分离。