Suppr超能文献

与错误显著性处理和感觉运动适应相关的感觉运动后运动期和前周期β波段活动的不同调制。

Distinct Modulations in Sensorimotor Postmovement and Foreperiod β-Band Activities Related to Error Salience Processing and Sensorimotor Adaptation.

作者信息

Torrecillos Flavie, Alayrangues Julie, Kilavik Bjørg Elisabeth, Malfait Nicole

机构信息

Institut de Neurosciences de la Timone, UMR7289, CNRS/Aix Marseille Université, 13005 Marseille, France.

Institut de Neurosciences de la Timone, UMR7289, CNRS/Aix Marseille Université, 13005 Marseille, France

出版信息

J Neurosci. 2015 Sep 16;35(37):12753-65. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1090-15.2015.

Abstract

UNLABELLED

In a recent study, Tan et al. (2014a,b) showed that the increase in β-power typically observed after a movement above sensorimotor regions (β-rebound) is attenuated when movement-execution errors are induced by visual perturbations. Moreover, akin to sensorimotor adaptation, the effect depended on the context in which the errors are experienced. Thus the β-rebound attenuation might relate to neural processes involved in trial-to-trial adaptive mechanisms. In two EEG experiments with human participants, along with the β-rebound, we examine β-activity during the preparation of reaches immediately following perturbed movements. In the first experiment, we show that both foreperiod and postmovement β-activities are parametrically modulated by the sizes of kinematic errors produced by unpredictable mechanical perturbations (force field) independent of their on-line corrections. In the second experiment, we contrast two types of reach errors: movement-execution errors that trigger trial-to-trial adaptive mechanisms and goal errors that do not elicit sensorimotor adaptation. Movement-execution errors were induced by mechanical or visual perturbations, whereas goal errors were caused by unexpected displacements of the target at movement initiation. Interestingly, foreperiod and postmovement β-activities exhibit contrasting patterns, pointing to important functional differences of their underlying neuronal activity. While both types of reach errors attenuate the postmovement β-rebound, only the kinematic errors that trigger trial-to-trial motor-command updates influenced β-activity during the foreperiod. These findings suggest that the error-related modulation of the β-rebound may reflect salience processing, independent of sensorimotor adaptation. In contrast, modulations in the foreperiod β-power might relate to the motor-command adjustments activated after movement-execution errors are experienced.

SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT

The functional significance of sensorimotor β-band (15-25 Hz) oscillations remains uncertain. Recently β-power was found to be reduced following erroneous movements. We extend and refine this novel finding in two crucial ways. First, by contrasting the EEG correlates of movement errors driving or not driving adaptation we dissociate error-salience processing from error-based adaptation. Second, in addition to β-activity in error trials, we examine β-power during the preparation of the subsequent movements. We find clearly distinct patterns of error-related modulations for β-activities preceding and succeeding movements, highlighting critical functional differences. Postmovement β-power may reflect error-salience processing independent of sensorimotor adaptation. In contrast, modulations in the foreperiod β-band power may directly relate to the motor-command adjustments activated after movement-execution errors are experienced.

摘要

未标注

在最近的一项研究中,谭等人(2014a,b)表明,当视觉干扰导致运动执行错误时,通常在感觉运动区域上方运动后观察到的β功率增加(β反弹)会减弱。此外,类似于感觉运动适应,这种效应取决于出现错误的背景。因此,β反弹减弱可能与逐次试验适应性机制中涉及的神经过程有关。在两项针对人类参与者的脑电图实验中,除了β反弹外,我们还研究了受干扰运动后紧接着伸手准备过程中的β活动。在第一个实验中,我们表明,前运动期和运动后β活动都受到不可预测的机械干扰(力场)产生的运动学误差大小的参数调制,而与它们的在线校正无关。在第二个实验中,我们对比了两种类型的伸手误差:触发逐次试验适应性机制的运动执行误差和不会引发感觉运动适应的目标误差。运动执行误差由机械或视觉干扰引起,而目标误差是由运动开始时目标的意外位移导致的。有趣的是,前运动期和运动后β活动呈现出对比模式,表明其潜在神经元活动存在重要的功能差异。虽然两种类型的伸手误差都会减弱运动后β反弹,但只有触发逐次试验运动指令更新的运动学误差会在前运动期影响β活动。这些发现表明,β反弹的误差相关调制可能反映了显著性处理,与感觉运动适应无关。相比之下,前运动期β功率的调制可能与经历运动执行误差后激活的运动指令调整有关。

意义声明

感觉运动β波段(15 - 25赫兹)振荡的功能意义仍不确定。最近发现错误运动后β功率会降低。我们通过两种关键方式扩展并完善了这一新颖发现。首先,通过对比驱动或不驱动适应的运动误差的脑电图相关性,我们将误差显著性处理与基于误差的适应区分开来。其次,除了错误试验中的β活动外,我们还研究了后续运动准备过程中的β功率。我们发现运动前后β活动的误差相关调制模式明显不同,突出了关键的功能差异。运动后β功率可能反映与感觉运动适应无关的误差显著性处理。相比之下,前运动期β波段功率的调制可能直接与经历运动执行误差后激活的运动指令调整有关。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

1
The readiness potential reflects detailed prediction of action outcome.准备电位反映了对动作结果的详细预测。
Imaging Neurosci (Camb). 2025 Apr 25;3. doi: 10.1162/imag_a_00546. eCollection 2025.
7
An active inference account of stuttering behavior.口吃行为的主动推理解释。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2025 Apr 3;19:1498423. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2025.1498423. eCollection 2025.

本文引用的文献

2
The role of high-frequency oscillatory activity in reward processing and learning.高频振荡活动在奖励处理和学习中的作用。
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2015 Feb;49:1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2014.11.014. Epub 2014 Nov 25.
10
Vocal learning is constrained by the statistics of sensorimotor experience.发声学习受到感觉运动经验统计数据的限制。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012 Dec 18;109(51):21099-103. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1213622109. Epub 2012 Dec 3.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验