Solberg V B, Neidhardt K, Sardelis M R, Hildebrandt C, Hoffmann F J, Boobar L R
U.S. Army Biomedical Research and Development Laboratory, Fort Detrick, Frederick, Maryland 21702.
J Med Entomol. 1992 May;29(3):451-6. doi: 10.1093/jmedent/29.3.451.
Three tick-sampling methods (dry ice-baited tick traps, cloth drags, and ambulatory human host) were evaluated to determine which technique yielded the greatest capture of host-seeking stages of Ixodes dammini Spielman, Clifford, Piesman & Corwin and Amblyomma americanum (L.). The most reliable method, catching more stages and significantly more numbers of I. dammini and A. americanum; was dry ice-baited tick traps. There were no significant differences between the drag and human-host methods for any stage of ticks (I. dammini and A. americanum) collected. The numbers of ticks caught during the study were 5,052 by dry ice-baited tick traps, 199 by cloth drags, and 89 by ambulatory human host.
评估了三种蜱虫采样方法(干冰诱捕蜱虫陷阱、布拖法和活动的人类宿主),以确定哪种技术能捕获最多的达米尼硬蜱(Ixodes dammini Spielman、Clifford、Piesman & Corwin)和美洲钝缘蜱(Amblyomma americanum (L.))寻找宿主阶段的蜱虫。最可靠的方法是干冰诱捕蜱虫陷阱,它捕获到更多阶段的蜱虫,并且捕获的达米尼硬蜱和美洲钝缘蜱数量显著更多。对于收集到的任何阶段的蜱虫(达米尼硬蜱和美洲钝缘蜱),布拖法和人类宿主法之间没有显著差异。研究期间,干冰诱捕蜱虫陷阱捕获的蜱虫数量为5052只,布拖法捕获199只,活动的人类宿主捕获89只。