Suppr超能文献

在未经过挑选的患者中,选择性单胚胎移植可避免多胎妊娠,但与双胚胎移植相比,其妊娠率显著降低:一项随机对照试验。

In unselected patients, elective single embryo transfer prevents all multiples, but results in significantly lower pregnancy rates compared with double embryo transfer: a randomized controlled trial.

作者信息

van Montfoort Aafke P A, Fiddelers Audrey A A, Janssen J Marij, Derhaag Josien G, Dirksen Carmen D, Dunselman Gerard A J, Land Jolande A, Geraedts Joep P M, Evers Johannes L H, Dumoulin John C M

机构信息

Research Institute Growth & Development (GROW), Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Academic Hospital Maastricht, PO Box 5800, 6202 AZ Maastricht, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Hum Reprod. 2006 Feb;21(2):338-43. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dei359. Epub 2005 Oct 27.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Elective single embryo transfer (eSET) in a selected group of patients (i.e. young patients with at least one good quality embryo) reduces the number of multiple pregnancies in an IVF programme. However, the reduced overall multiple pregnancy rate (PR) is still unacceptably high. Therefore, a randomized controlled trial (RCT) was conducted comparing eSET and double embryo transfer (DET) in an unselected group of patients (i.e. irrespective of the woman's age or embryo quality).

METHODS

Consenting unselected patients were randomized between eSET (RCT-eSET) (n = 154) or DET (RCT-DET) (n = 154). Randomization was performed just prior to the first embryo transfer, provided that at least two 2PN zygotes were available. Non-participants received our standard transfer policy [SP-eSET in a selected group of patients (n = 100), otherwise SP-DET (n = 122)].

RESULTS

The ongoing PR after RCT-eSET was significantly lower as compared with RCT-DET (21.4 versus 40.3%) and the twin PR was reduced from 21.0% after RCT-DET to 0% after RCT-eSET. The ongoing PRs after SP-eSET and SP-DET did not differ significantly (33.0 versus 30.3%), with an overall twin PR of 12.9%.

CONCLUSION

To avoid twin pregnancies resulting from an IVF treatment, eSET should be applied in all patients. The consequence would be a halving of the ongoing PR as compared with applying a DET policy in all patients. The transfer of one embryo in a selected group of good prognosis patients leads to a less drastic reduction in PR but maintains a twin PR of 12.9%.

摘要

背景

在特定患者群体(即至少有一个优质胚胎的年轻患者)中进行选择性单胚胎移植(eSET)可降低体外受精(IVF)计划中多胎妊娠的数量。然而,整体多胎妊娠率(PR)的降低仍然高得令人无法接受。因此,进行了一项随机对照试验(RCT),在未经过筛选的患者群体(即不考虑女性年龄或胚胎质量)中比较eSET和双胚胎移植(DET)。

方法

同意参与的未经过筛选的患者被随机分为eSET组(RCT - eSET)(n = 154)或DET组(RCT - DET)(n = 154)。随机分组在首次胚胎移植前进行,前提是至少有两个2PN受精卵可用。未参与者接受我们的标准移植策略[在特定患者群体中进行SP - eSET(n = 100),否则进行SP - DET(n = 122)]。

结果

与RCT - DET相比,RCT - eSET后的持续妊娠率显著降低(分别为21.4%和40.3%),双胎妊娠率从RCT - DET后的21.0%降至RCT - eSET后的0%。SP - eSET和SP - DET后的持续妊娠率无显著差异(分别为33.0%和30.3%),总体双胎妊娠率为12.9%。

结论

为避免IVF治疗导致双胎妊娠,应在所有患者中应用eSET。与对所有患者应用DET策略相比,其结果将使持续妊娠率减半。在预后良好的特定患者群体中移植一个胚胎导致的妊娠率降低幅度较小,但双胎妊娠率仍维持在12.9%。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验