Gowen E, Abadi R V, Poliakoff E
Behavioural Brain Sciences, School of Psychology, Hills Building, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK.
Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 2005 Dec;25(3):810-25. doi: 10.1016/j.cogbrainres.2005.09.002. Epub 2005 Oct 26.
Fixation to a target in primary gaze is invariably interrupted by physiological conjugate saccadic intrusions (SI). These small idiosyncratic eye movements (usually <1 degrees in amplitude) take the form of an initial horizontal fast eye movement away from the desired eye position, followed after a variable duration by a return saccade or drift. As the aetiology of SI is still unclear, it was the aim of this study to investigate whether SI are related to exogenous or endogenous attentional processes. This was achieved by varying (a) the "bottom-up" target viewing conditions (target presence, servo control of the target, target background, target size) and (b) the 'top-down' attentional state (instruction change--'look' or 'hold eyes steady' and passive fixation versus active--'respond to change' fixation) in 13 subjects (the number of participants in each task varied between 7 and 11). We also manipulated the orientation of pure exogenous attention through a cue-target task, during which subjects were required to respond to a target, preceded by a non-informative cue by either pressing a button or making a saccade towards the target. SI amplitude, duration, frequency and direction were measured. SI amplitude was found to be significantly higher when the target was absent and SI frequency significantly lower during open loop conditions. Target size and background influenced SI behaviour in an idiosyncratic manner, although there was a trend for subjects to exhibit lower SI frequencies and amplitudes when a patterned background was present and larger SI amplitudes with larger target sizes. SI frequency decreased during the "hold eyes steady" passive command as well as during active fixation but SI direction was not influenced by the exogenous cue-target task. These results suggest that SI are related to endogenous rather than exogenous attention mechanisms. Our experiments lead us to propose that SI represent shifts in endogenous attention that reflect a baseline attention state present during laboratory fixation tasks and may prove to be a useful tool to explore higher cortical control of fixation.
在初始注视中对目标的固定总是会被生理性共轭扫视侵入(SI)打断。这些微小的特异性眼球运动(通常幅度<1度)表现为最初的水平快速眼球运动,使其偏离期望的眼球位置,在一段可变的持续时间后,接着是一个返回扫视或漂移。由于SI的病因仍不清楚,本研究的目的是调查SI是否与外源性或内源性注意力过程有关。这是通过改变(a)“自下而上”的目标观察条件(目标存在、目标的伺服控制、目标背景、目标大小)和(b)13名受试者的“自上而下”注意力状态(指令改变——“看”或“保持眼睛稳定”以及被动注视与主动——“对变化做出反应”注视)来实现的(每个任务的参与者数量在7至11人之间变化)。我们还通过一个线索-目标任务操纵了纯外源性注意力的方向,在此任务中,要求受试者在一个无信息线索之后,通过按下按钮或向目标进行扫视来对目标做出反应。测量了SI的幅度、持续时间、频率和方向。发现当目标不存在时SI幅度显著更高,在开环条件下SI频率显著更低。目标大小和背景以一种特异的方式影响SI行为,尽管当存在图案背景时受试者有表现出更低SI频率和幅度的趋势,并且目标越大SI幅度越大。在“保持眼睛稳定”的被动指令期间以及主动注视期间SI频率降低,但SI方向不受外源性线索-目标任务的影响。这些结果表明SI与内源性而非外源性注意力机制有关。我们的实验使我们提出,SI代表内源性注意力的转移,反映了实验室固定任务期间存在的基线注意力状态,并且可能被证明是探索对注视的高级皮质控制的一个有用工具。