Suppr超能文献

通过加成法评估固体表面张力的有效性和准确性。

Validity and accuracy in evaluating surface tension of solids by additive approaches.

作者信息

Shalel-Levanon Sagit, Marmur Abraham

机构信息

Department of Chemical Engineering, Technion, Israel Institute of Technology, 32000 Haifa, Israel.

出版信息

J Colloid Interface Sci. 2003 Jun 15;262(2):489-99. doi: 10.1016/S0021-9797(02)00231-X.

Abstract

The validity and the accuracy of both the Owens and Wendt and the Lifshitz-van der Waals/acid-base (LW/AB) methods for the determination of surface tensions of solids have been examined for a wide variety of situations. In each case, the allowed range of contact angles that result in positive values of all the square roots of the surface tension components of the solid has first been determined. Then the maximum relative errors in the surface tensions of solids that result from errors in contact angle measurements have been calculated within the allowed range. For both methods, it has been found that the maximum relative errors are minimal if one of the liquids is apolar. In the case of the LW/AB method, minimal errors are obtained if, in addition, the other two liquids are monopolar with different polarities. However, the more similar are the properties of the liquids, the narrower is the allowed range, and the larger are the maximum relative errors.

摘要

对于多种情况,已对欧文斯和温特法以及利夫希茨 - 范德华力/酸碱(LW/AB)法测定固体表面张力的有效性和准确性进行了检验。在每种情况下,首先确定能使固体表面张力分量的所有平方根值为正的接触角允许范围。然后在该允许范围内计算由接触角测量误差导致的固体表面张力的最大相对误差。对于这两种方法都发现,如果其中一种液体是非极性的,最大相对误差最小。对于LW/AB法,此外,如果另外两种液体是具有不同极性的单极性液体,则可获得最小误差。然而,液体的性质越相似,允许范围越窄,最大相对误差就越大。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验