David Tirone E, Ivanov Joan, Armstrong Susan, Christie Debbie, Rakowski Harry
Division of Cardiovascular Surgery and Cardiology of Toronto General Hospital and the University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2005 Nov;130(5):1242-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2005.06.046. Epub 2005 Oct 13.
We sought to compare the clinical and echocardiographic outcomes of mitral valve repair for mitral regurgitation in patients with degenerative disease of the mitral valve with posterior, anterior, or bileaflet prolapse.
Patients underwent operations from 1981 through 2001: 359 had posterior (mean age, 60.4 years), 92 had anterior (mean age, 53.3 years), and 250 had bileaflet (means age, 56.4 years) prolapse. Patients with anterior prolapse were younger (P = .04) and had more associated aortic valve disease (P = .02), particularly bicuspid aortic valve disease (P < .001). Anterior prolapse was corrected by using chordal replacement with Gore-Tex sutures in most patients, but early on in this series, leaflet resection, chordal shortening, and chordal transfer were also used. Echocardiograms were done annually, and clinical follow-up was complete at a mean of 6.9 +/- 4.0 years (range, 0-23 years).
The overall survival at 12 years was 75% +/- 5%, with no difference among the posterior, anterior, and bileaflet prolapse groups (P = .3). The freedom from reoperation at 12 years was 96% +/- 2% for posterior, 88% +/- 4% for anterior, and 94% +/- 2% for bileaflet prolapse (P = .019). Anterior prolapse was the only independent predictor of reoperation. The freedom from moderate or severe mitral regurgitation at 12 years was 80% +/- 4% for posterior, 65% +/- 8% for anterior, and 67% +/- 6% for bileaflet prolapse (P = .001). Anterior and bileaflet prolapse, age, ejection fraction of less than 40%, and aortic valve disease were independent predictors of recurrent moderate or severe mitral regurgitation.
The pathophysiology of mitral regurgitation affects the durability of mitral valve repair for degenerative disease, and the results of posterior prolapse are better than those of anterior and bileaflet prolapse. This study indicates that rates of reoperation underscore the rates of failure of mitral valve repair.
我们试图比较二尖瓣后叶、前叶或双叶脱垂的二尖瓣退行性病变患者二尖瓣反流二尖瓣修复术的临床和超声心动图结果。
患者于1981年至2001年接受手术:359例为后叶脱垂(平均年龄60.4岁),92例为前叶脱垂(平均年龄53.3岁),250例为双叶脱垂(平均年龄56.4岁)。前叶脱垂患者更年轻(P = 0.04),合并主动脉瓣疾病更多(P = 0.02),尤其是二叶式主动脉瓣疾病(P < 0.001)。大多数前叶脱垂患者通过使用Gore-Tex缝线进行腱索置换来矫正,但在本系列研究早期,也采用了瓣叶切除、腱索缩短和腱索转移。每年进行超声心动图检查,平均随访6.9±4.0年(范围0 - 23年)时完成临床随访。
12年时总体生存率为75%±5%,后叶、前叶和双叶脱垂组之间无差异(P = 0.3)。12年时后叶脱垂患者再次手术率为96%±2%,前叶脱垂患者为88%±4%,双叶脱垂患者为94%±2%(P = 0.019)。前叶脱垂是再次手术的唯一独立预测因素。12年时后叶脱垂患者无中度或重度二尖瓣反流率为80%±4%,前叶脱垂患者为65%±8%,双叶脱垂患者为67%±6%(P = 0.001)。前叶和双叶脱垂、年龄、射血分数低于40%以及主动脉瓣疾病是复发性中度或重度二尖瓣反流的独立预测因素。
二尖瓣反流的病理生理学影响二尖瓣退行性病变修复术的耐久性,后叶脱垂的结果优于前叶和双叶脱垂。本研究表明再次手术率突出了二尖瓣修复术的失败率。