Suppr超能文献

在腹部手术部位的术前准备中,仅涂擦法与擦洗加涂擦法效果相当。

Paint-only is equivalent to scrub-and-paint in preoperative preparation of abdominal surgery sites.

作者信息

Ellenhorn Joshua D I, Smith David D, Schwarz Roderich E, Kawachi Mark H, Wilson Timothy G, McGonigle Kathryn F, Wagman Lawrence D, Paz I Benjamin

机构信息

Division of Surgery, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA 91010, USA.

出版信息

J Am Coll Surg. 2005 Nov;201(5):737-41. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2005.05.023. Epub 2005 Aug 31.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Antiseptic preoperative skin site preparation is used to prepare the operative site before making a surgical incision. The goal of this preparation is a reduction in postoperative wound infection. The most straightforward technique necessary to achieve this goal remains controversial.

STUDY DESIGN

A prospective randomized trial was designed to prove equivalency for two commonly used techniques of surgical skin site preparation. Two hundred thirty-four patients undergoing nonlaparoscopic abdominal operations were consented for the trial. Exclusion criteria included presence of active infection at the time of operation, neutropenia, history of skin reaction to iodine, or anticipated insertion of prosthetic material at the time of operation. Patients were randomized to receive either a vigorous 5-minute scrub with povidone-iodine soap, followed by absorption with a sterile towel, and a paint with aqueous povidone-iodine or surgical site preparation with a povidone-iodine paint only. The primary end point of the study was wound infection rate at 30 days, defined as presence of clinical signs of infection requiring therapeutic intervention.

RESULTS

Patients randomized to the scrub-and-paint arm (n = 115) and the paint-only arm (n = 119) matched at baseline with respect to age, comorbidity, wound classification, mean operative time, placement of drains, prophylactic antibiotic use, and surgical procedure (all p > 0.09). Wound infection occurred in 12 (10%) scrub-and-paint patients, and 12 (10%) paint-only patients. Based on our predefined equivalency parameters, we conclude equivalence of infection rates between the two preparations.

CONCLUSIONS

Preoperative preparation of the abdomen with a scrub with povidone-iodine soap followed by a paint with aqueous povidone-iodine can be abandoned in favor of a paint with aqueous povidone-iodine alone. This change will result in reductions in operative times and costs.

摘要

背景

术前皮肤消毒准备用于在手术切口前准备手术部位。这种准备的目的是降低术后伤口感染率。实现这一目标所需的最直接技术仍存在争议。

研究设计

一项前瞻性随机试验旨在证明两种常用的手术皮肤部位准备技术的等效性。234例接受非腹腔镜腹部手术的患者同意参加该试验。排除标准包括手术时存在活动性感染、中性粒细胞减少、对碘有皮肤反应史或手术时预期植入假体材料。患者被随机分为两组,一组先用聚维酮碘皂大力擦洗5分钟,然后用无菌毛巾吸干,再用聚维酮碘水溶液涂抹;另一组仅用聚维酮碘水溶液进行手术部位准备。该研究的主要终点是30天时的伤口感染率,定义为存在需要治疗干预的感染临床体征。

结果

随机分为擦洗加涂抹组(n = 115)和仅涂抹组(n = 119)的患者在年龄、合并症、伤口分类、平均手术时间、引流管放置、预防性抗生素使用和手术操作方面在基线时匹配(所有p>0.09)。擦洗加涂抹组有12例(10%)患者发生伤口感染,仅涂抹组有12例(10%)患者发生伤口感染。根据我们预先定义的等效性参数,我们得出两种准备方法的感染率等效。

结论

术前用聚维酮碘皂擦洗腹部然后用聚维酮碘水溶液涂抹的方法可以放弃,而采用仅用聚维酮碘水溶液涂抹的方法。这种改变将导致手术时间和成本的降低。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验