Lewin Allison, Moore Geoffrey R, Le Brun Nick E
Centre for Metalloprotein Spectroscopy and Biology, School of Chemical Sciences and Pharmacy, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK.
Dalton Trans. 2005 Nov 21(22):3597-610. doi: 10.1039/b506071k. Epub 2005 Jun 29.
The ability of iron to cycle between Fe(2+) and Fe(3+) forms has led to the evolution, in different forms, of several iron-containing protein cofactors that are essential for a wide variety of cellular processes, to the extent that virtually all cells require iron for survival and prosperity. The redox properties of iron, however, also mean that this metal is potentially highly toxic and this, coupled with the extreme insolubility of Fe(3+), presents the cell with the significant problem of how to maintain this essential metal in a safe and bioavailable form. This has been overcome through the evolution of proteins capable of reversibly storing iron in the form of a Fe(3+) mineral. For several decades the ferritins have been synonymous with the function of iron storage. Within this family are subfamilies of mammalian, plant and bacterial ferritins which are all composed of 24 subunits assembled to form an essentially spherical protein with a central cavity in which the mineral is laid down. In the past few years it has become clear that other proteins, belonging to the family of DNA-binding proteins from starved cells (the Dps family), which are oligomers of 12 subunits, and to the frataxin family, which may contain up to 48 subunits, are also able to lay down a Fe(3+) mineral core. Here we present an overview of the formation of protein-coated iron minerals, with particular emphasis on the structures of the protein coats and the mechanisms by which they promote core formation. We show on the one hand that significant mechanistic similarities exist between structurally dissimilar proteins, while on the other that relatively small structural differences between otherwise similar proteins result in quite dramatic mechanistic differences.
铁在Fe(2+)和Fe(3+)形式之间循环的能力导致了几种含铁蛋白质辅因子以不同形式进化,这些辅因子对于多种细胞过程至关重要,以至于几乎所有细胞都需要铁来维持生存和繁衍。然而,铁的氧化还原特性也意味着这种金属具有潜在的高毒性,再加上Fe(3+)的极高不溶性,这给细胞带来了一个重大问题,即如何将这种必需金属维持在安全且可生物利用的形式。这一问题通过能够以Fe(3+)矿物质形式可逆储存铁的蛋白质的进化而得以解决。几十年来,铁蛋白一直是铁储存功能的代名词。在这个家族中,有哺乳动物、植物和细菌铁蛋白亚家族,它们均由24个亚基组装而成,形成一个基本呈球形的蛋白质,其中心有一个腔,矿物质沉积于此。在过去几年中,已经明确属于饥饿细胞DNA结合蛋白家族(Dps家族)的其他蛋白质(它们是由12个亚基组成的寡聚体)以及可能包含多达48个亚基的铁调素家族的蛋白质,也能够形成Fe(3+)矿物质核心。在此,我们概述了蛋白质包裹的铁矿物质的形成,特别强调了蛋白质外壳的结构以及它们促进核心形成的机制。我们一方面表明,结构不同的蛋白质之间存在显著的机制相似性,而另一方面表明,在其他方面相似的蛋白质之间相对较小的结构差异会导致相当显著的机制差异。