Kim Seok Jin, Kim Byung Soo, Ryu Suck Won, Yoo Ji Hyun, Oh Jee Hyun, Song Chang Hee, Kim Sun Haeng, Choi Dong Seop, Seo Jae Hong, Choi Chul Won, Shin Sang Won, Kim Yeul Hong, Kim Jun Suk
Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Korea University Medical Center, 126-1 Anam-dong 5ga, Sungbuk-gu, Seoul 136-705, Korea.
Yonsei Med J. 2005 Oct 31;46(5):693-9. doi: 10.3349/ymj.2005.46.5.693.
Human embryonic stem (ES) cells can be induced to differentiate into hematopoietic precursor cells via two methods: the formation of embryoid bodies (EBs) and co-culture with mouse bone marrow (BM) stromal cells. In this study, the above two methods have been combined by co-culture of human ES-cell-derived EBs with human BM stromal cells. The efficacy of this method was compared with that using EB formation alone. The undifferentiated human ES cell line SNUhES3 was allowed to form EBs for two days, then EBs were induced to differentiate in the presence of a different serum concentration (EB and EB/high FBS group), or co- cultured with human BM stromal cells (EB/BM co-culture group). Flow cytometry and hematopoietic colony-forming assays were used to assess hematopoietic differentiation in the three groups. While no significant increase of CD34+/CD45- or CD34+/CD38- cells was noted in the three groups on days 3 and 5, the percentage of CD34+/CD45- cells and CD34+/ CD38- cells was significantly higher in the EB/BM co-culture group than in the EB and EB/high FBS groups on day 10. The number of colony-forming cells (CFCs) was increased in the EB/BM co-culture group on days 7 and 10, implying a possible role for human BM stromal cells in supporting hematopoietic differentiation from human ES cell-derived EBs. These results demonstrate that co-culture of human ES-cell-derived EBs with human BM stromal cells might lead to more efficient hematopoietic differentiation from human ES cells cultured alone. Further study is warranted to evaluate the underlying mechanism.
人胚胎干细胞(ES细胞)可通过两种方法诱导分化为造血前体细胞:形成胚状体(EBs)以及与小鼠骨髓(BM)基质细胞共培养。在本研究中,通过将人ES细胞来源的EBs与人BM基质细胞共培养,将上述两种方法结合起来。将该方法的效果与单独使用EB形成的方法进行比较。使未分化的人ES细胞系SNUhES3形成EBs两天,然后在不同血清浓度下诱导EBs分化(EB和EB/高胎牛血清组),或与人BM基质细胞共培养(EB/BM共培养组)。采用流式细胞术和造血集落形成试验评估三组中的造血分化情况。虽然在第3天和第5天,三组中CD34+/CD45-或CD34+/CD38-细胞均未显著增加,但在第10天,EB/BM共培养组中CD34+/CD45-细胞和CD34+/CD38-细胞的百分比显著高于EB组和EB/高胎牛血清组。在第7天和第10天,EB/BM共培养组中的集落形成细胞(CFCs)数量增加,这意味着人BM基质细胞在支持人ES细胞来源的EBs进行造血分化中可能发挥作用。这些结果表明,人ES细胞来源的EBs与人BM基质细胞共培养可能会使人ES细胞单独培养时的造血分化更有效。有必要进一步研究以评估其潜在机制。