Zherlov G K, Koshel A P, Rudaia N S, Aksenenko A V, Lobachev R S, Nustafaev R S, Raĭsh D V, Koshel' E A
Eksp Klin Gastroenterol. 2004(6):78-82, 165.
The article describes a comparative analysis of the efficacy of various variants of nutritive support in 115 patients with complicated gastroduodenal ulcers at the early postoperative period. 95 patients received enteral tube feeding, 50 of them receiving balanced isocaloric formulas and 45 of them receiving broths and decoctions as a nutritious substrate. The control group comprised 20 patients who received full parenteral feeding. The results were assessed on Day 5 after the beginning of feeding. Satisfactory results were received in all of the groups. The main advantages of balanced formulas are their easy dosage, smaller number of complications and lower price (as compared to parenteral feeding) as well as better (as compared to "ordinary" products) indexes of the nutritious status recovery.
本文描述了对115例术后早期并发胃十二指肠溃疡患者采用不同营养支持方式的疗效对比分析。95例患者接受肠内管饲，其中50例接受等热量平衡配方，45例接受肉汤和煎剂作为营养底物。对照组包括20例接受全胃肠外营养的患者。在开始喂养后第5天评估结果。所有组均取得了满意的结果。平衡配方的主要优点是剂量易于控制、并发症较少、价格较低（与胃肠外营养相比）以及营养状况恢复指标更好（与“普通”产品相比）。
