Pradhan Archana, Sparano Dina, Ananth Cande V
Division of General Obstetrics and Gynecology, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, UMDNJ-Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, NJ 08901-1977, USA.
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005 Nov;193(5):1827-30. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2005.07.075.
The purpose of the study was to compare delivery methods of lecture material regarding contraceptive options by either traditional or interactive lecture style with the use of an audience response system with obstetrics and gynecology residents.
A prospective, randomized controlled trial that included 17 obstetrics and gynecology residents was conducted. Group differences and comparison of pre/posttest scores to evaluate efficacy of lecture styles were performed with the Student t test. Each participant completed an evaluation to assess usefulness of the audience response system.
Residents who received audience response system interactive lectures showed a 21% improvement between pretest and posttest scores; residents who received the standard lecture demonstrated a 2% improvement (P = .018). The evaluation survey showed that 82% of residents thought that the audience response system was a helpful learning aid.
The results of this randomized controlled trial demonstrate the effectiveness of audience response system for knowledge retention, which suggests that it may be an efficient teaching tool for residency education.
本研究旨在比较采用传统讲座方式或互动讲座方式并使用听众反应系统向妇产科住院医师讲授避孕方法的授课效果。
开展了一项前瞻性随机对照试验,纳入了17名妇产科住院医师。采用学生t检验进行组间差异分析以及前后测分数比较,以评估授课方式的效果。每位参与者都完成了一项评估,以评价听众反应系统的实用性。
接受听众反应系统互动讲座的住院医师前后测分数提高了21%;接受标准讲座的住院医师分数提高了2%(P = 0.018)。评估调查显示,82%的住院医师认为听众反应系统是一种有用的学习辅助工具。
这项随机对照试验的结果证明了听众反应系统在知识保留方面的有效性,这表明它可能是住院医师教育的一种有效教学工具。