Suppr超能文献

替莫唑胺联合α-干扰素与单用替莫唑胺治疗晚期转移性黑色素瘤患者的疗效比较:一项来自皮肤协作肿瘤学组的随机、III期、多中心研究

Temozolomide in combination with interferon-alfa versus temozolomide alone in patients with advanced metastatic melanoma: a randomized, phase III, multicenter study from the Dermatologic Cooperative Oncology Group.

作者信息

Kaufmann Roland, Spieth Konstanze, Leiter Ulrike, Mauch Cornelia, von den Driesch Peter, Vogt Thomas, Linse Ruthild, Tilgen Wolfgang, Schadendorf Dirk, Becker Jürgen C, Sebastian Günther, Krengel Sven, Kretschmer Lutz, Garbe Claus, Dummer Reinhard

机构信息

Department of Dermatology, J.W. Goethe-University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.

出版信息

J Clin Oncol. 2005 Dec 10;23(35):9001-7. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2005.01.1551. Epub 2005 Oct 31.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Temozolomide (TMZ) has shown efficacy in metastatic melanoma equal to that of dacarbazine (DTIC), the standard chemotherapeutic agent for melanoma. As the combination with interferon-alfa (IFN-alpha) appears superior to single-agent DTIC regarding response rates, the purpose of this study was to compare TMZ alone and TMZ plus IFN-alpha in terms of objective response (OR), overall survival, and safety in a prospective, randomized, multicenter trial.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Two hundred ninety-four patients with untreated stage IV metastatic melanoma (American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system) were randomly assigned to receive either oral TMZ alone (200 mg/m2/day; days 1 through 5 every 28 days) or in combination with subcutaneous IFN-alpha (5 MU/m2; days 1, 3, and 5 every week).

RESULTS

Two hundred eighty-two patients were eligible for an intent-to-treat analysis, 271 patients were treated per protocol. In the TMZ + IFN-alpha arm, 33 (24.1%) of 137 patients responded to therapy (partial or complete remission) whereas in the monotherapy arm, in 18 (13.4%) of 134 patients, a response was evident. Thus, the response rate was significantly higher in the combination arm (P = .036). Median survival time was 8.4 months for patients treated with TMZ (95% CI, 7.07 to 9.27) and 9.7 months for those treated with the combination (95% CI, 8.26 to 11.18; P = .16). Dose modifications and interval prolongations due to hematologic toxicity were significantly more frequent in the TMZ + IFN-alpha arm (P < .001).

CONCLUSION

In metastatic melanoma treatment with TMZ + IFN-alpha leads to a significantly superior OR rate compared to treatment with TMZ alone, which did not translate into prolonged survival in our study population.

摘要

目的

替莫唑胺(TMZ)在转移性黑色素瘤治疗中显示出与达卡巴嗪(DTIC,黑色素瘤的标准化疗药物)相当的疗效。鉴于联合干扰素-α(IFN-α)在缓解率方面似乎优于单药DTIC,本研究旨在通过一项前瞻性、随机、多中心试验,比较单独使用TMZ和TMZ联合IFN-α在客观缓解(OR)、总生存期和安全性方面的差异。

患者与方法

294例未经治疗的IV期转移性黑色素瘤患者(采用美国癌症联合委员会分期系统)被随机分配,分别接受单独口服TMZ(200mg/m²/天;每28天的第1至5天)或联合皮下注射IFN-α(5MU/m²;每周的第1、3和5天)治疗。

结果

282例患者符合意向性分析标准,271例患者按方案接受治疗。在TMZ + IFN-α治疗组中,137例患者中有33例(24.1%)对治疗有反应(部分或完全缓解),而在单药治疗组中,134例患者中有18例(13.4%)有明显反应。因此,联合治疗组的缓解率显著更高(P = 0.036)。TMZ治疗患者的中位生存时间为8.4个月(95%CI,7.07至9.27),联合治疗患者为9.7个月(95%CI,8.26至11.18;P = 0.16)。由于血液学毒性导致的剂量调整和疗程延长在TMZ + IFN-α治疗组中明显更频繁(P < 0.001)。

结论

在转移性黑色素瘤治疗中,与单独使用TMZ相比,TMZ + IFN-α治疗导致明显更高的OR率,但在我们的研究人群中并未转化为更长的生存期。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验