• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

成人焦虑症的循证评估

Evidence-based assessment of anxiety disorders in adults.

作者信息

Antony Martin M, Rowa Karen

机构信息

St. Joseph's Healthcare, Hamilton, ON, Canada.

出版信息

Psychol Assess. 2005 Sep;17(3):256-66. doi: 10.1037/1040-3590.17.3.256.

DOI:10.1037/1040-3590.17.3.256
PMID:16262452
Abstract

This article discusses issues related to the development and dissemination of evidence-based assessment strategies for anxiety disorders and associated problems. It begins with a review of the criteria that should be considered when determining whether particular assessment procedures are evidence-based. These include such factors as reliability, validity, cost-effectiveness, consumer acceptability, utility across different populations, and ease of dissemination. The importance of considering the purpose of the assessment process when deciding whether a procedure is evidence-based is emphasized. Next, the major assessment domains that are particularly important in the area of anxiety disorders (e.g., triggers for anxiety symptoms, avoidance behaviors) are reviewed. Finally, some potential obstacles to the dissemination of evidence-based assessment procedures are discussed along with suggestions for managing these obstacles.

摘要

本文讨论了与焦虑症及相关问题的循证评估策略的开发与传播相关的问题。文章开篇回顾了在确定特定评估程序是否为循证程序时应考虑的标准。这些标准包括可靠性、有效性、成本效益、消费者可接受性、在不同人群中的实用性以及传播的便利性等因素。文中强调了在判定一个程序是否为循证程序时考虑评估过程目的的重要性。接下来,回顾了在焦虑症领域特别重要的主要评估领域(例如,焦虑症状的触发因素、回避行为)。最后,讨论了循证评估程序传播的一些潜在障碍,并提出了应对这些障碍的建议。

相似文献

1
Evidence-based assessment of anxiety disorders in adults.成人焦虑症的循证评估
Psychol Assess. 2005 Sep;17(3):256-66. doi: 10.1037/1040-3590.17.3.256.
2
Evidence-based psychological treatments for late-life anxiety.基于证据的老年焦虑症心理治疗方法。
Psychol Aging. 2007 Mar;22(1):8-17. doi: 10.1037/0882-7974.22.1.8.
3
Pain-related anxiety and anxiety sensitivity across anxiety and depressive disorders.各类焦虑症和抑郁症中与疼痛相关的焦虑及焦虑敏感性。
J Anxiety Disord. 2009 Aug;23(6):791-8. doi: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2009.03.003. Epub 2009 Mar 27.
4
Considering the clinical utility of performance-based measures of childhood anxiety.
J Clin Child Psychol. 2000 Dec;29(4):493-508. doi: 10.1207/S15374424JCCP2904_4.
5
Procedures and methods of benefit assessments for medicines in Germany.德国药品效益评估的程序和方法。
Eur J Health Econ. 2008 Nov;9 Suppl 1:5-29. doi: 10.1007/s10198-008-0122-5.
6
Guidelines and algorithms for anxiety disorders: evidence-based excellence or garbage in, garbage out?
Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2006 Aug;8(4):253-5.
7
[Anxiety and depression in children and adolescents with migraine: a review of the literature].[偏头痛儿童和青少年的焦虑与抑郁:文献综述]
Encephale. 2008 Oct;34(5):504-10. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2007.08.005. Epub 2007 Dec 26.
8
Complementary and alternative medicine in the treatment of anxiety and depression.补充和替代医学在焦虑症和抑郁症治疗中的应用
Curr Opin Psychiatry. 2008 Jan;21(1):37-42. doi: 10.1097/YCO.0b013e3282f2d814.
9
Anxiety and substance use: layers of complexity.焦虑与物质使用:复杂的层面
Expert Rev Neurother. 2008 Mar;8(3):493-501. doi: 10.1586/14737175.8.3.493.
10
Recognizing and treating late-life generalized anxiety disorder: distinguishing features and psychosocial treatment.
Expert Rev Neurother. 2006 Oct;6(10):1439-45. doi: 10.1586/14737175.6.10.1439.

引用本文的文献

1
Evidence-Based Assessment of Substance Use Disorder.基于证据的物质使用障碍评估。
Assessment. 2024 Jan;31(1):168-190. doi: 10.1177/10731911231177252. Epub 2023 Jun 15.
2
Clinicians' perceptions and practices of diagnostic assessment in psychiatric services.精神科服务中临床医生对诊断评估的看法和做法。
BMC Psychiatry. 2023 Mar 23;23(1):191. doi: 10.1186/s12888-023-04689-w.
3
A Content Analysis of Self-report Child Anxiety Measures.自我报告儿童焦虑量表的内容分析。
Child Psychiatry Hum Dev. 2024 Aug;55(4):873-881. doi: 10.1007/s10578-022-01455-z. Epub 2022 Oct 20.
4
The psychometric properties of the of the Persian version of the Screen for adult anxiety related disorders (SCAARED) in patients with anxiety disorders.焦虑障碍患者的成人焦虑相关障碍筛查表(SCAARED)波斯语版本的心理测量特性。
Brain Behav. 2022 Jul;12(7):e2647. doi: 10.1002/brb3.2647. Epub 2022 Jun 17.
5
The Development of Explicit and Implicit Game-Based Digital Behavioral Markers for the Assessment of Social Anxiety.用于评估社交焦虑的基于游戏的显性和隐性数字行为标记的开发
Front Psychol. 2021 Dec 15;12:760850. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.760850. eCollection 2021.
6
Efficacy of transdiagnostic behavior therapy on transdiagnostic avoidance in veterans with emotional disorders.跨诊断行为治疗对情绪障碍退伍军人跨诊断回避的疗效。
J Clin Psychol. 2020 Jan;76(1):31-39. doi: 10.1002/jclp.22874. Epub 2019 Oct 17.
7
Activation vs. Experiential Avoidance as a Transdiagnostic Condition of Emotional Distress: An Empirical Study.作为情绪困扰的一种跨诊断条件的激活与经验性回避:一项实证研究。
Front Psychol. 2018 Sep 3;9:1618. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01618. eCollection 2018.
8
Psychometrics of the screen for adult anxiety related disorders (SCAARED)- A new scale for the assessment of DSM-5 anxiety disorders.成人焦虑相关障碍筛查量表(SCAARED)的心理测量学——一种用于评估《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第5版焦虑症的新量表。
Psychiatry Res. 2017 Jul;253:84-90. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2017.02.034. Epub 2017 Feb 17.
9
The Behavioral Avoidance Task with Anxious Youth: A Review of Procedures, Properties, and Criticisms.《有焦虑问题的青少年的行为回避任务:程序、属性和批评的回顾》。
Clin Child Fam Psychol Rev. 2017 Jun;20(2):162-184. doi: 10.1007/s10567-016-0220-3.
10
Dimensional Assessment of Anxiety in Puerto Rican Patients: Evaluating Applicability of Psychological Questionnaires.波多黎各患者焦虑的维度评估:心理问卷适用性评估
P R Health Sci J. 2016 Sep;35(3):134-41.