Cain W S, de Wijk R A, Jalowayski A A, Pilla Caminha G, Schmidt R
Chemosensory Perception Laboratory, Department of Surgery (Otolaryngology), University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093-0957, USA.
Indoor Air. 2005 Dec;15(6):445-57. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0668.2005.00390.x.
An experiment explored ability of subjects to detect vapors of the plasticizer TXIB (2,2,4-trimethyl-1,3-pentanediol diisobutyrate) and ethanol via olfaction and via ocular and nasal chemesthesis, i.e. chemically stimulated feel. Testing, tailored to the sensitivity of each subject, produced psychometric functions for individuals. Olfactory detection of TXIB began at concentrations below 1 ppb (v/v), with 50% correct detection at 1.2 ppb. (Comparable detection for ethanol occurred almost two orders of magnitude higher.) Chemesthetic detection of TXIB began at about 500 ppb, with 50% correct detection at 2.1 ppm for the eye and 4.6 ppm for the nose, both close to saturated vapor concentration. (Comparable detection for ethanol occurred essentially three orders of magnitude higher.) Suggestions that TXIB plays a role in generation of irritative symptoms at concentrations in the range of parts-per-billion need to reckon with a conservatively estimated 200-fold gap between the levels putatively 'responsible' for the symptoms and those even minimally detectable via chemesthesis. Neither the variable of exposure duration nor that of mixing offers a likely explanation. Inclusion of ethanol in the study allowed comparisons pertinent to issues of variability in human chemoreception. An interpretation of the psychometric functions for individuals across materials and perceptual continua led to the conclusion that use of concentration as the metric of detection in olfaction inflates individual differences.
This study indicated that the plasticizer TXIB could contribute odor at concentrations in the range of parts-per-billion, but could hardly contribute sensory irritation per se, as alleged in reports of some field studies where TXIB has existed amongst many other organic compounds.
一项实验探究了受试者通过嗅觉以及眼部和鼻部化学感觉(即化学刺激引起的感觉)来检测增塑剂TXIB(2,2,4 - 三甲基 - 1,3 - 戊二醇二异丁酸酯)和乙醇蒸汽的能力。根据每个受试者的敏感度进行测试,得出了个体的心理测量函数。对TXIB的嗅觉检测在浓度低于1 ppb(体积比)时开始,在1.2 ppb时正确检测率为50%。(乙醇的可比检测浓度几乎高两个数量级。)对TXIB的化学感觉检测在约500 ppb时开始,眼睛在2.1 ppm时正确检测率为50%,鼻子在4.6 ppm时正确检测率为50%,两者都接近饱和蒸汽浓度。(乙醇的可比检测浓度基本上高三个数量级。)有观点认为TXIB在十亿分之一浓度范围内会引发刺激性症状,但需要考虑到,推测导致症状的浓度与通过化学感觉能检测到的最低浓度之间保守估计有200倍的差距。暴露持续时间和混合变量都无法对此做出合理的解释。在研究中纳入乙醇有助于对人类化学感受变异性的相关问题进行比较。对不同材料和感知连续体的个体心理测量函数进行解读后得出结论:在嗅觉检测中使用浓度作为检测指标会夸大个体差异。
本研究表明,增塑剂TXIB在十亿分之一浓度范围内可能会产生气味,但正如一些现场研究报告中所声称的,在存在许多其他有机化合物的情况下,TXIB本身几乎不会导致感官刺激。