State Key Laboratory of Environmental and Biological Analysis, Hong Kong Baptist University, Hong Kong, SAR 999077, China.
School of Environment, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Environmental Pollution and Health, Jinan University, Guangzhou 510632, China.
Environ Sci Technol. 2023 Mar 7;57(9):3634-3644. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.2c08110. Epub 2023 Feb 22.
Along with the restrictions of phthalate esters (PAEs), a variety of nonphthalate plasticizers (NPPs) have been increasingly used for industrial needs. Knowledge remains limited on the environmental occurrences, fate, and human exposure risks of many emerging NPPs. In this study, we investigated a suite of 45 NPPs along with the major PAEs in house dust from five regions in the Asia-Pacific region and the United States. The findings clearly demonstrated ubiquitous occurrences of many NPPs in the home environment, particularly acetyl tributyl citrate (ATBC), tricapryl trimellitate (TCTM), trioctyl trimellitate (TOTM), glycerol monooleate (GMO), methyl oleate (MO), and diisobutyl adipate (DiBA). The median total concentrations of NPPs ranged from 17.8 to 252 μg/g in the study regions, while the mean ratios of ΣNPPs to ΣPAEs ranged from 0.19 (Hanoi) to 0.72 (Adelaide). Spatial differences were observed not only for the chemical abundances but also for the composition profiles and the hazard quotient (HQ) prioritization of individual chemicals. Although the current exposure may unlikely cause significant health risks according to the HQ estimation, potential exposure risks cannot be overlooked, due to the lack of appropriate toxic threshold data, the existence of additional exposure pathways, and possible cocktail effects from coexisting NPPs and PAEs.
随着邻苯二甲酸酯(PAEs)的限制,各种非邻苯二甲酸酯类增塑剂(NPPs)已越来越多地被用于工业需求。对于许多新兴的 NPPs 的环境出现、命运和人类暴露风险,人们的了解仍然有限。在这项研究中,我们调查了亚太地区和美国五个地区家庭灰尘中 45 种 NPPs 以及主要的 PAEs。研究结果清楚地表明,许多 NPPs 在家庭环境中普遍存在,特别是乙酰三丁基柠檬酸酯(ATBC)、三辛基三邻苯二甲酸酯(TCTM)、三辛基偏苯三酸酯(TOTM)、甘油单油酸酯(GMO)、油酸甲酯(MO)和二异丁基邻苯二甲酸酯(DiBA)。在所研究的地区,NPPs 的中值总浓度范围为 17.8 至 252μg/g,而ΣNPPs 与 ΣPAEs 的平均比值范围为 0.19(河内)至 0.72(阿德莱德)。不仅观察到了化学丰度的空间差异,还观察到了组成分布和个别化学物质的危害商(HQ)优先排序的空间差异。尽管根据 HQ 估计,目前的暴露不太可能导致显著的健康风险,但由于缺乏适当的毒性阈值数据、存在额外的暴露途径以及共存的 NPPs 和 PAEs 可能产生的鸡尾酒效应,潜在的暴露风险不容忽视。