Cain W S, Schmidt R, Wolkoff P
Chemosensory Perception Laboratory, Department of Surgery (Otolaryngology), University of California-San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093-0957, USA.
Indoor Air. 2007 Oct;17(5):337-47. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0668.2007.00476.x.
Young adult subjects who occupied a well-ventilated space with low background of level of ozone achieved via carbon-filtration could detect ozone odor at 7 ppb, lower than expected from archival compilations. The outcome was not inconsistent, however, with some observations of recognition, beyond mere detection, at about 15-20 ppb. Individual differences in sensitivity lay at or just below an order of magnitude, rare in olfactory testing and indicative of precision. In a study of d-limonene, subjects again showed high sensitivity and small individual differences. The subjects could detect the odor at 8 and 15 ppb, depending upon whether they occupied a space with or without carbon filtration, respectively. The results argue for use of carbon filtration to measure sensitivity most stringently, although absence of filtration seems not to incur a large penalty. The protocol used here, with collection of hundreds of judgments in a day, yet with little net exposure of the subject to odorant; with verifiably stable delivery; and with analytical confirmation of level should reduce tolerance for outcomes of large differences among subjects and among studies.
Humans manifested much higher sensitivity to ozone and D-limonene than commonly thought, a pattern revealing itself more broadly in olfactory studies as testing improves and analytical confirmation of delivery becomes more common. Published databases, with errors of +/-1000%, often badly underestimate sensitivity and can thereby encourage use of higher concentrations of compounds, particularly VOCs, than relevant in studies of reactive indoor chemistry.
通过碳过滤实现低臭氧背景水平且通风良好的空间中的年轻成年受试者能够在7 ppb时检测到臭氧气味,这一浓度低于档案汇编中的预期。然而,这一结果与一些关于在约15 - 20 ppb时不仅能检测到,还能识别臭氧的观察结果并不矛盾。嗅觉测试中,个体敏感性差异处于或略低于一个数量级,这种情况很少见,表明了精确性。在一项关于d - 柠檬烯的研究中,受试者同样表现出高敏感性和小的个体差异。根据他们所处空间是否有碳过滤,受试者分别能在8 ppb和15 ppb时检测到该气味。结果表明,尽管没有过滤似乎不会造成太大影响,但使用碳过滤能最严格地测量敏感性。这里使用的方案,一天内收集数百次判断,且受试者对气味剂的净暴露很少;气味剂输送可验证稳定;水平有分析确认,应该会降低对受试者之间以及研究之间差异巨大的结果的容忍度。
人类对臭氧和d - 柠檬烯的敏感性比通常认为的要高得多,随着测试改进以及输送的分析确认变得更普遍,这种模式在嗅觉研究中更广泛地显现出来。已发表的数据库误差高达±1000%,常常严重低估敏感性,从而可能鼓励在室内反应化学研究中使用比实际情况更高浓度的化合物,尤其是挥发性有机化合物。