D'Souza Gypsyamber, Sugar Elizabeth, Ruby William, Gravitt Patti, Gillison Maura
Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21231, USA.
J Clin Microbiol. 2005 Nov;43(11):5526-35. doi: 10.1128/JCM.43.11.5526-5535.2005.
Human papillomavirus (HPV) has recently been associated with oral cancers. To prepare for a study of the natural history of oral HPV infection, the effect of the DNA purification method on HPV genomic DNA detection in Scope mouthwash oral rinse samples and the reproducibility of HPV detection in rinse samples collected 7 days apart were investigated. The study was conducted with a population at high risk for oral HPV infection: human immunodeficiency virus-infected men with CD4-cell counts <200. Five DNA purification methods were compared among equal aliquots of oral rinse samples collected from a subset of individuals. The purification methods included (i) proteinase K digestion (PKD) and heat inactivation; (ii) PKD and ethanol precipitation (EP); (iii) PKD, phenol-chloroform extraction, and EP; (iv) use of the Puregene DNA purification kit; and (v) use of the QIAamp DNA Blood Midi kit. HPV was detected by PCR amplification with PGMY09 and PGMY11 L1 primer pools and by use of a Roche linear array. Puregene-purified samples had higher human DNA yields and purities, and Puregene purification detected the greatest number of HPV-positive subjects and total HPV infections in comparison to the numbers detected by all other methods. The total number of HPV infections and HPV prevalence estimates were also higher for Puregene-processed oral rinse samples when a fixed volume (10 mul) rather than a fixed cell number ( approximately 50,000 cells) was used for PCR amplification. A good concordance was observed for oral HPV infection status (agreement, 80%; kappa value, = 0.60) and type-specific infection (agreement, 98%; kappa value, 0.57) in matched oral rinse samples. The method of DNA purification significantly affects the detection of HPV genomic DNA from oral rinse samples and may result in exposure misclassification that could contribute to the inconsistent associations reported in the literature.
人乳头瘤病毒(HPV)最近被发现与口腔癌有关。为开展一项关于口腔HPV感染自然史的研究,本研究调查了DNA纯化方法对Scope漱口水口腔冲洗样本中HPV基因组DNA检测的影响,以及间隔7天采集的冲洗样本中HPV检测的可重复性。该研究针对口腔HPV感染高危人群开展:即CD4细胞计数<200的人类免疫缺陷病毒感染男性。从部分个体采集的等量口腔冲洗样本中比较了五种DNA纯化方法。纯化方法包括:(i)蛋白酶K消化(PKD)和热灭活;(ii)PKD和乙醇沉淀(EP);(iii)PKD、酚-氯仿萃取和EP;(iv)使用Puregene DNA纯化试剂盒;(v)使用QIAamp DNA Blood Midi试剂盒。通过使用PGMY09和PGMY11 L1引物池进行PCR扩增以及使用罗氏线性阵列检测HPV。与所有其他方法相比,经Puregene纯化的样本具有更高的人类DNA产量和纯度,并且检测到的HPV阳性受试者和HPV总感染数最多。当使用固定体积(10微升)而非固定细胞数(约50,000个细胞)进行PCR扩增时,经Puregene处理的口腔冲洗样本的HPV总感染数和HPV患病率估计值也更高。在匹配的口腔冲洗样本中,观察到口腔HPV感染状态(一致性为80%;kappa值=0.60)和型特异性感染(一致性为98%;kappa值为0.57)具有良好的一致性。DNA纯化方法显著影响口腔冲洗样本中HPV基因组DNA的检测,并可能导致暴露错误分类,这可能导致文献报道的关联不一致。