Jakubowski Moshe, Silberstein Stephen, Ashkenazi Avi, Burstein Rami
Department of Anesthesia and Critical Care, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Neurology. 2005 Nov 8;65(9):1419-22. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000183358.53939.38.
The gradual development of cutaneous allodynia during the course of a migraine attack is commonly detected by quantitative sensory testing (QST) in migraineurs seeking secondary and tertiary medical help. In this study, the authors developed a questionnaire that tested the recollection of the patients on their skin sensitivity during past migraine attacks.
The authors devised a series of questions regarding skin sensitivity during migraine and posed them to 89 migraineurs when they were free of migraine (Visit 1). To validate their recollections, the authors determined the patients' pain thresholds to mechanical and thermal skin stimuli in the absence of migraine (Visit 1) and during an attack (Visit 2), using QST.
Whereas 75.3% of the patients testified to at least one type of skin hypersensitivity during migraine, 24.7% were unaware of any abnormal skin sensitivity. The questionnaire correctly identified 84.8% of the 66 patients classified as allodynic by QST and mislabeled the remaining 15.2% as nonallodynic (false negatives). Among the 23 patients classified as nonallodynic by QST, 47.8% were mislabeled as allodynic using the questionnaire (false positives). Among the total number of 89 patients studied, the questionnaire produced 62.9% true positives and 13.5% true negatives (= 76.4% correct labeling) vs 12.4% false positives and 11.2% false negatives (= 23.6% mislabeling).
The reliability of the questionnaire as a diagnostic tool of allodynia varies with the proportion of allodynic patients in a given clinic. The major source of variability is the misconception of nonallodynic patients that their skin is hypersensitive during migraine.
在寻求二级和三级医疗帮助的偏头痛患者中,通过定量感觉测试(QST)通常可检测到偏头痛发作过程中皮肤异常性疼痛的逐渐发展。在本研究中,作者设计了一份问卷,以测试患者对过去偏头痛发作期间皮肤敏感性的回忆。
作者设计了一系列关于偏头痛期间皮肤敏感性的问题,并在89名偏头痛患者无偏头痛发作时(就诊1)向他们提出这些问题。为了验证他们的回忆,作者在无偏头痛发作时(就诊1)和发作期间(就诊2)使用QST测定了患者对机械和热皮肤刺激的疼痛阈值。
75.3%的患者证实偏头痛期间至少有一种皮肤超敏反应,24.7%的患者未意识到任何异常的皮肤敏感性。该问卷正确识别了QST分类为异常性疼痛的66名患者中的84.8%,并将其余15.2%误标记为非异常性疼痛(假阴性)。在QST分类为非异常性疼痛的23名患者中,47.8%使用该问卷被误标记为异常性疼痛(假阳性)。在总共89名研究患者中,该问卷产生了62.9%的真阳性和13.5%的真阴性(=76.4%正确标记),而假阳性为12.4%,假阴性为11.2%(=23.6%错误标记)。
作为异常性疼痛诊断工具的问卷的可靠性因特定诊所中异常性疼痛患者的比例而异。变异性的主要来源是非异常性疼痛患者误认为他们在偏头痛期间皮肤超敏。