Demeter Sandor, Reed Martin, Lix Lisa, MacWilliam Leonard, Leslie William D
Radiology and Diagnostic Imaging, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Man.
CMAJ. 2005 Nov 8;173(10):1173-7. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.050609.
In publicly funded health care systems, the utilization of health care services should be equitable, irrespective of socioeconomic status (SES). Although the association between SES and health care utilization has been examined in Canada relative to surgical, cardiac and preventive health care services, no published studies have specifically explored the association between SES and diagnostic imaging.
We examined over 300,000 diagnostic imaging claims made in the Winnipeg Regional Health Authority between Apr. 1, 2001, and Mar. 31, 2002. Using patient postal codes, we assigned SES on the basis of average household incomes in Canada's 1996 census. Using multiple regression, we examined the association between income quintile, patient age group (< or =16, 17-64, > or = 65 years), patient morbidity level according to the Johns Hopkins University Adjusted Clinical Group method (high, moderate, low), and imaging modality (general radiology, vascular, computed tomography, magnetic resonance, and general and obstetric ultrasound).
Relative rates (RR) of diagnostic imaging utilization (highest v. lowest income quintile) were significantly increased in pediatric and adult patient groups at all morbidity levels receiving general radiology (highest RR 2.47, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.07-2.93); pediatric and adult patient groups at high and low morbidity levels and elderly patient groups at low morbidity levels receiving general ultrasound (highest RR 2.26, 95% CI 1.20-4.26); pediatric and adult patient groups at all morbidity levels and elderly patients at high and moderate morbidity levels receiving magnetic resonance imaging (highest RR 2.51, 95% CI 1.78- 3.52); and adult patient groups at all morbidity levels receiving computed tomography (highest RR 1.46, 95% CI 1.35- 1.59). A lower RR of diagnostic imaging utilization in the highest income quintile was found only among patients receiving obstetric ultrasound (RR 0.80, 95% CI 0.73-0.87). No significant associations were found among elderly patients receiving general radiology or computed tomography or adult patients receiving vascular imaging.
We found a pattern of increased diagnostic imaging utilization in patient groups with a higher SES. Further research is needed to better understand the nature of this finding and how it contributes to health outcomes.
在公共资助的医疗保健系统中,医疗保健服务的利用应该是公平的,无论社会经济地位(SES)如何。尽管在加拿大已经针对外科、心脏和预防性医疗保健服务研究了SES与医疗保健利用之间的关联,但尚无已发表的研究专门探讨SES与诊断成像之间的关联。
我们研究了2001年4月1日至2002年3月31日期间温尼伯地区卫生局提出的30多万份诊断成像申请。利用患者邮政编码,我们根据加拿大1996年人口普查中的平均家庭收入来确定SES。使用多元回归分析,我们研究了收入五分位数、患者年龄组(≤16岁、17 - 64岁、≥65岁)、根据约翰霍普金斯大学调整临床分组方法确定的患者发病水平(高、中、低)以及成像方式(普通放射学、血管造影、计算机断层扫描、磁共振成像以及普通和产科超声)之间的关联。
在接受普通放射学检查的所有发病水平的儿科和成人患者组中,诊断成像利用的相对率(RR)(最高收入五分位数与最低收入五分位数相比)显著增加(最高RR为2.47,95%置信区间[CI]为2.07 - 2.93);在高发病水平和低发病水平的儿科和成人患者组以及低发病水平的老年患者组中,接受普通超声检查时诊断成像利用的相对率增加(最高RR为2.26,95% CI为1.20 - 4.26);在所有发病水平的儿科和成人患者组以及高发病水平和中等发病水平的老年患者组中,接受磁共振成像检查时诊断成像利用的相对率增加(最高RR为2.51,95% CI为1.78 - 3.52);在所有发病水平的成人患者组中,接受计算机断层扫描时诊断成像利用的相对率增加(最高RR为1.46,95% CI为1.35 - 1.59)。仅在接受产科超声检查的患者中发现最高收入五分位数的诊断成像利用相对率较低(RR为0.80,95% CI为0.73 - 0.87)。在接受普通放射学或计算机断层扫描的老年患者或接受血管成像的成人患者中未发现显著关联。
我们发现SES较高的患者组中诊断成像利用增加的模式。需要进一步研究以更好地理解这一发现的本质及其对健康结果的影响。