Suppr超能文献

社会经济地位与烧伤严重程度的关系。

Association between socioeconomic status and burn injury severity.

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine, Cheju National University College of Medicine, 66 Jejudaehakno, Jeju-si, Jeju Special Self-governing Province 690-756, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

Burns. 2009 Jun;35(4):482-90. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2008.10.007. Epub 2009 Feb 11.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

It has been previously established that the incidence of burn is higher in lower socioeconomic (SES) groups. What is not clear, however, is whether or not the severity of burn is also higher in lower SES groups. The purpose of this study is to establish a relationship between household-level socioeconomic status (SES) and severity-based incidence of burn.

METHODS

A burn injury database was generated from the National Injury Database (2001-2003) with a 1-year follow-up period containing information about the date and time of burn injury, the International Classification of Disease 10th Edition-based (ICD-10) diagnostic codes, gender, age, residence, and type of insurance. In addition, we calculated the severity of each burn using the Excess Mortality Ratio-adjusted Injury Severity Score (EMR-ISS), which is similar to the New Injury Severity Score. Socioeconomic status was measured on the basis of quintiles of premiums for National Health Insurance, which was decided on a household-level either by monthly salary (Employee Insurance, EI) or by owned property (Self-Employed Insurance, SEI). Medical Aid (MA) population was regarded as a reference. After calculation of 5 year-gender specific standardized incidence rates (SIRs) of burn by SES groups, the association of SES and severity of burn was evaluated using a multivariate logistic regression model and the Cox-proportional hazard regression analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 870,411 burn cases were examined. The standardized incident rates (SIRs) of mild(1<or=EMR-ISS<or=8), moderate(9<or=EMR-ISS<or=24), severe(25<or=EMR-ISS<or=74), critical(EMR-ISS=75 or death), and total burn injury were 4951, 951, 124, 20, and 6046 per 1,000,000 person-years, respectively. Meaningful changes of relative risk by severity were found: it was greater in higher SES groups (0.67 in the highest SEI, 0.58 in the highest EI) compared to the Medical Aid (MA) population. For injuries classified to be greater than severe (25<or=EMR-ISS), odds ratios according to increase of SES level were significantly decreased to 0.77 in SEI and 0.63 in EI. For critical injuries, hazard ratios were also significantly decreased to 0.51 in the highest SEI and 0.32 in the highest EI.

CONCLUSIONS

Severity-based incidence of burn was significantly affected by household-level SES in a nationwide cohort study, with more severe injuries noted in the lower socioeconomic groups.

摘要

背景

先前的研究已经证实,较低社会经济地位(SES)群体的烧伤发病率更高。然而,目前尚不清楚较低 SES 群体的烧伤严重程度是否也更高。本研究的目的是确定家庭层面 SES 与基于严重程度的烧伤发病率之间的关系。

方法

从国家伤害数据库(2001-2003 年)中生成了一个烧伤伤害数据库,该数据库包含了烧伤伤害的日期和时间、基于国际疾病分类第 10 版(ICD-10)的诊断代码、性别、年龄、居住地点和保险类型等信息。此外,我们使用校正后的死亡率比调整的损伤严重度评分(EMR-ISS)计算了每个烧伤的严重程度,该评分与新损伤严重度评分相似。SES 是根据国家健康保险保费的五分位数来衡量的,这是根据家庭层面的月工资(雇员保险,EI)或自有财产(自营职业保险,SEI)来决定的。医疗补助(MA)人群被视为参照。计算了 SES 组 5 年特定性别标准化发病率(SIR)后,使用多元逻辑回归模型和 Cox 比例风险回归分析评估 SES 与烧伤严重程度之间的关系。

结果

共检查了 870411 例烧伤病例。轻度(1<或=EMR-ISS<或=8)、中度(9<或=EMR-ISS<或=24)、重度(25<或=EMR-ISS<或=74)、危重度(EMR-ISS=75 或死亡)和总烧伤损伤的标准化发病比(SIR)分别为 4951、951、124、20 和 6046 每 1000000 人年。严重程度的相对风险有明显变化:与医疗补助(MA)人群相比,SES 较高的群体(SEI 最高的为 0.67,EI 最高的为 0.58)变化更大。对于分类为重度以上(25<或=EMR-ISS)的损伤,根据 SES 水平增加的优势比显著降低,SEI 为 0.77,EI 为 0.63。对于危重度损伤,危险比也显著降低,SEI 最高时为 0.51,EI 最高时为 0.32。

结论

在全国性队列研究中,基于严重程度的烧伤发病率受到家庭层面 SES 的显著影响,较低社会经济群体的烧伤严重程度更高。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验