Suppr超能文献

雾化呋塞米治疗儿童中度哮喘发作的疗效

Efficacy of nebulized furosemide in children with moderate attack of asthma.

作者信息

Alshehri M, Almegamesi T, Alfrayh A

机构信息

Department of Pediatrics, College of Medicine, King Khalid University, Abha, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.

出版信息

West Afr J Med. 2005 Jul-Sep;24(3):246-51. doi: 10.4314/wajm.v24i3.28207.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Bronchodilators are the most commonly used drugs for asthma. However, alternative treatment is necessary for those patients who experience adverse effects from bronchodilators.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the efficacy of nebulized furosemide in children with moderate asthma exacerbations.

METHOD AND MATERIALS

A double-blind randomized, controlled trial involving three groups of children with moderate attack of asthma. Twenty children were enrolled in group A and received nebulized albuterol, 20 children in group B received nebulized furosemide and 19 children in group C received both albuterol and furosemide. Pulmonary function parameters, peak flow rates, respiratory rate, oxygen saturation and clinical scores were obtained before and after treatment.

RESULTS

The maximum increases in FEV1 achieved were 21.1 +/- 4.6 %, 20.8 +/- 3.2 and 21.7 +/- 4.9 in groups A, B and C respectively. The differences between the groups were not significant. Maximum increase in FVC was 20.3 +/- 1.6, 22.5 +/- 5.8 % and 24.5 +/- 4.9 % in groups B and C respectively. The difference between the three groups was not statistically significant. With regards to peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR), the mean increase after treatment was 23.5 +/- 8.6% and 21.8 +/- 6.3% in groups A and B respectively. There was significant increase in PEFR in group C children (26.0 +/- 9.1%; p = 0.01). There was no statistical significant difference among the three groups regarding the improvement in respiratory rate, SaO2 and clinical scores.

CONCLUSION

Combination of both furosemide and albuterol led to significant increase in peak flow rate but it did not significantly affect FEV1, FVC, FEF 25-75, respiratory rate, SaO2 or clinical scores as compared to other groups. There were no significant adverse effects from the three drugs used.

摘要

背景

支气管扩张剂是治疗哮喘最常用的药物。然而,对于那些使用支气管扩张剂出现不良反应的患者,需要其他治疗方法。

目的

研究雾化吸入速尿对中度哮喘发作儿童的疗效。

方法与材料

一项双盲随机对照试验,涉及三组中度哮喘发作儿童。A组纳入20名儿童,接受雾化沙丁胺醇治疗;B组20名儿童接受雾化速尿治疗;C组19名儿童接受沙丁胺醇和速尿联合治疗。在治疗前后获取肺功能参数、峰值流速、呼吸频率、血氧饱和度和临床评分。

结果

A、B、C组FEV1的最大增加量分别为21.1±4.6%、20.8±3.2%和21.7±4.9%。各组之间差异不显著。B组和C组FVC的最大增加量分别为20.3±1.6%、22.5±5.8%和24.5±4.9%。三组之间差异无统计学意义。关于呼气峰值流速(PEFR),A组和B组治疗后的平均增加量分别为23.5±8.6%和21.8±6.3%。C组儿童的PEFR有显著增加(26.0±9.1%;p = 0.01)。三组在呼吸频率、SaO2和临床评分的改善方面无统计学显著差异。

结论

与其他组相比,速尿和沙丁胺醇联合使用导致峰值流速显著增加,但对FEV1、FVC、FEF 25 - 75、呼吸频率、SaO2或临床评分没有显著影响。所使用的三种药物均未产生显著不良反应。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验