Qureshi F, Zaritsky A, Lakkis H
Pediatric Emergency Medicine Section, Children's Hospital of The King's Daughters, Eastern Virginia Medical School, Norfolk, USA.
Ann Emerg Med. 1997 Feb;29(2):205-11. doi: 10.1016/s0196-0644(97)70269-5.
To determine the effect of adding the nebulized anticholinergic drug ipratropium bromide to standard therapy compared with standard therapy alone for acute severe asthma (peak expiratory flow rate [PEFR] < 50% of predicted) in children presenting to the emergency department.
Ninety children aged 6 to 18 years were randomly assigned to two groups in a prospective, double-blind, placebo-controlled study performed in the ED of an urban children's hospital. All children received nebulized albuterol solution (.15 mg/kg) every 30 minutes, and all received oral steroids with the second dose of albuterol. Children in group 1 received ipratropium bromide (500 micrograms/dose) with the first and third dose of albuterol those in group 2 received saline placebo instead of ipratropium. Pulmonary functions (PEFR and 1-second forced expiratory volume [FEV1]) and physiologic measurements were assessed every 30 minutes up to 120 minutes. By chance, the baseline values for percent of predicted PEFR and FEV1 differed between the two groups. Therefore a multivariate model accounting for both time and baseline effects was used to compare the response between groups.
On average, and adjusting for baseline measures, children in the ipratropium group had a significantly greater improvement in percent of predicted PEFR than did children in the placebo group at 60 minutes (P = .02), 90 minutes (P = .002), and 120 minutes (P < .0001). The improvement in percent predicted FEV1 was significantly greater for children in the ipratropium group only at 120 minutes (P = .013). Nine children (20%) from the ipratropium group and 14 (31.1%) from the control group were admitted (P = .33, chi 2). There were no significant adverse effects attributable to the ipratropium, and there was no relation between ipratropium use and changes in pulse, respiratory rate, blood pressure, or oxygen saturation.
We detected significant improvement in pulmonary function studies over 120 minutes in children with severe asthma who were given nebulized ipratropium combined with albuterol and oral steroids, compared with children who received the standard therapy. Further study is needed to determine whether early use of ipratropium decreases the need for hospitalization.
在一家城市儿童医院急诊科就诊的患有急性重度哮喘(呼气峰值流速[PEFR]<预测值的50%)的儿童中,确定与单独标准治疗相比,在标准治疗基础上加用雾化抗胆碱能药物异丙托溴铵的效果。
在一家城市儿童医院急诊科进行的一项前瞻性、双盲、安慰剂对照研究中,将90名6至18岁的儿童随机分为两组。所有儿童每30分钟接受一次雾化沙丁胺醇溶液(0.15mg/kg),并在第二次使用沙丁胺醇时均接受口服类固醇治疗。第1组儿童在第一次和第三次使用沙丁胺醇时接受异丙托溴铵(500微克/剂量),第2组儿童则接受生理盐水安慰剂而非异丙托溴铵。在长达120分钟的时间内,每30分钟评估一次肺功能(PEFR和1秒用力呼气量[FEV1])和生理指标。偶然的是,两组之间预测PEFR和FEV1百分比的基线值有所不同。因此,使用一个考虑时间和基线效应的多变量模型来比较两组之间的反应。
平均而言,在调整基线测量值后,异丙托溴铵组儿童与安慰剂组儿童相比,在60分钟(P = 0.02)、90分钟(P = 0.002)和120分钟(P < 0.0001)时,预测PEFR百分比的改善显著更大。仅在120分钟时,异丙托溴铵组儿童预测FEV1百分比的改善显著更大(P = 0.013)。异丙托溴铵组有9名儿童(20%)、对照组有14名儿童(31.1%)入院(P = 0.33,卡方检验)。没有可归因于异丙托溴铵的显著不良反应,且使用异丙托溴铵与脉搏、呼吸频率、血压或血氧饱和度的变化之间没有关联。
我们发现,与接受标准治疗的儿童相比,在患有重度哮喘的儿童中,给予雾化异丙托溴铵联合沙丁胺醇和口服类固醇治疗120分钟后,肺功能研究有显著改善。需要进一步研究以确定早期使用异丙托溴铵是否能减少住院需求。