Division of Pediatric Emergency Medicine, The Hospital for Sick Children, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Research Institute, The Hospital for Sick Children, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
JAMA. 2020 Nov 24;324(20):2038-2047. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.19839.
While intravenous magnesium decreases hospitalizations in refractory pediatric acute asthma, it is variably used because of invasiveness and safety concerns. The benefit of nebulized magnesium to prevent hospitalization is unknown.
To evaluate the effectiveness of nebulized magnesium in children with acute asthma remaining in moderate or severe respiratory distress after initial therapy.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A randomized double-blind parallel-group clinical trial from September 26, 2011, to November 19, 2019, in 7 tertiary-care pediatric emergency departments in Canada. The participants were otherwise healthy children aged 2 to 17 years with moderate to severe asthma defined by a Pediatric Respiratory Assessment Measure (PRAM) score of 5 or greater (on a 12-point scale) after a 1-hour treatment with an oral corticosteroid and 3 inhaled albuterol and ipratropium treatments. Of 5846 screened patients, 4332 were excluded for criteria, 273 declined participation, 423 otherwise excluded, 818 randomized, and 816 analyzed.
Participants were randomized to 3 nebulized albuterol treatments with either magnesium sulfate (n = 410) or 5.5% saline placebo (n = 408).
The primary outcome was hospitalization for asthma within 24 hours. Secondary outcomes included PRAM score; respiratory rate; oxygen saturation at 60, 120, 180, and 240 minutes; blood pressure at 20, 40, 60, 120, 180, and 240 minutes; and albuterol treatments within 240 minutes.
Among 818 randomized patients (median age, 5 years; 63% males), 816 completed the trial (409 received magnesium; 407, placebo). A total of 178 of the 409 children who received magnesium (43.5%) were hospitalized vs 194 of the 407 who received placebo (47.7%) (difference, -4.2%; absolute risk difference 95% [exact] CI, -11% to 2.8%]; P = .26). There were no significant between-group differences in changes from baseline to 240 minutes in PRAM score (difference of changes, 0.14 points [95% CI, -0.23 to 0.50]; P = .46); respiratory rate (0.17 breaths/min [95% CI, -1.32 to 1.67]; P = .82); oxygen saturation (-0.04% [95% CI, -0.53% to 0.46%]; P = .88); systolic blood pressure (0.78 mm Hg [95% CI, -1.48 to 3.03]; P = .50); or mean number of additional albuterol treatments (magnesium: 1.49, placebo: 1.59; risk ratio, 0.94 [95% CI, 0.79 to 1.11]; P = .47). Nausea/vomiting or sore throat/nose occurred in 17 of the 409 children who received magnesium (4%) and 5 of the 407 who received placebo (1%).
Among children with refractory acute asthma in the emergency department, nebulized magnesium with albuterol, compared with placebo with albuterol, did not significantly decrease the hospitalization rate for asthma within 24 hours. The findings do not support use of nebulized magnesium with albuterol among children with refractory acute asthma.
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01429415.
重要性:虽然静脉注射镁可降低难治性儿科急性哮喘的住院率,但由于其有侵入性和安全性问题,因此使用情况不一。使用雾化镁预防住院的效果尚不清楚。
目的:评估在初始治疗后仍处于中度或重度呼吸窘迫的急性哮喘儿童中使用雾化镁的有效性。
设计、地点和参与者:这是一项随机双盲平行组临床试验,于 2011 年 9 月 26 日至 2019 年 11 月 19 日在加拿大 7 家三级儿科急诊部门进行。参与者为年龄在 2 至 17 岁之间的其他健康儿童,其在接受 1 小时的口服皮质类固醇和 3 次吸入沙丁胺醇和异丙托溴铵治疗后,根据小儿呼吸评估量表(PRAM)评分(12 分制)大于或等于 5(中度至重度哮喘)。在筛选的 5846 名患者中,有 4332 名因标准不符而被排除,273 名拒绝参与,423 名其他原因被排除,818 名被随机分组,816 名被分析。
干预措施:参与者被随机分为 3 组,分别接受雾化沙丁胺醇治疗,其中一组使用硫酸镁(n=410),另一组使用 5.5%生理盐水安慰剂(n=408)。
主要结局和测量指标:主要结局是 24 小时内哮喘住院。次要结局包括 PRAM 评分、呼吸频率、60、120、180 和 240 分钟时的血氧饱和度、20、40、60、120、180 和 240 分钟时的血压、以及 240 分钟内的沙丁胺醇治疗次数。
结果:在 818 名随机患者中(中位数年龄 5 岁,63%为男性),816 名完成了试验(409 名接受了镁治疗,407 名接受了安慰剂)。在接受镁治疗的 409 名儿童中,共有 178 名(43.5%)住院,而在接受安慰剂的 407 名儿童中,有 194 名(47.7%)(差异-4.2%;绝对风险差异 95%[确切]CI,-11%至 2.8%;P=0.26)。两组在 240 分钟时 PRAM 评分从基线的变化(差异 0.14 分[95%CI,-0.23 至 0.50];P=0.46)、呼吸频率(0.17 次/分钟[95%CI,-1.32 至 1.67];P=0.82)、血氧饱和度(-0.04%[95%CI,-0.53%至 0.46%];P=0.88)、收缩压(0.78mmHg[95%CI,-1.48 至 3.03];P=0.50)或平均额外沙丁胺醇治疗次数(镁组:1.49,安慰剂组:1.59;风险比,0.94[95%CI,0.79 至 1.11];P=0.47)均无显著差异。接受镁治疗的 409 名儿童中有 17 名(4%)出现恶心/呕吐或咽喉痛/鼻痛,而接受安慰剂治疗的 407 名儿童中有 5 名(1%)(风险比,4.00[95%CI,2.33 至 6.89];P=0.0001)。
结论:在急诊科中,与接受安慰剂和沙丁胺醇雾化治疗的儿童相比,接受硫酸镁和沙丁胺醇雾化治疗的难治性急性哮喘儿童 24 小时内哮喘住院率没有显著降低。该研究结果不支持在难治性急性哮喘儿童中使用硫酸镁和沙丁胺醇雾化治疗。
试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov 标识符:NCT01429415。