• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

美国人群中用于治疗精神疾病的处方药使用方面的种族差异。

Racial disparities in prescription drug use for mental illness among population in US.

作者信息

Han Euna, Liu Gordon G

机构信息

Department of Health Policy and Administration, School of Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 1103A McGavran-Greenberg Hall, CBZ7411, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-7411, USA.

出版信息

J Ment Health Policy Econ. 2005 Sep;8(3):131-43.

PMID:16278501
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Racial minorities are a rapidly growing portion of the US population. Research suggests that racial minorities are more vulnerable to mental illness due to risk factors, such as higher rates of poverty. Given that the burden of mental illnesses is significant, equal likelihood of mental health services utilization is important to reduce such burden. Racial minorities have been known to use mental health services less than Whites. However, it is unclear whether racial disparity in prescription drug use for mental illnesses exists in a nationally representative sample. For a valid estimation of prescription drug use patterns, the characteristic in the distribution of prescription drug use should be accounted for in the estimation model.

AIMS OF THE STUDY

This study is intended to document whether there was a disparity in psychiatric drug use in both extensive and intensive margins between Whites and three racial minorities: Blacks, Hispanics, and Asian-Indians. The study looked at several specified mental illnesses, controlling for underlying health status and other confounding factors.

METHODS

Secondary data analysis was conducted using the multiyear Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS), a nationally representative panel sample from 1996 through 2000. This analysis provides estimates of the actual expenditure on prescription drug use for people with specified mental illnesses for this study, based on comparison of Whites and other racial minorities. We derived the estimates from the two-part model, a framework that adjusts the likelihood of using prescription drugs for the specified mental illnesses while estimating the total actual expenditures on prescription drugs among the users.

RESULTS

This study found that Blacks, Hispanics, and Asian-Indians were less likely than Whites to use prescription drugs by 8.3, 6.1 and 23.6 percentage points, respectively, holding other factors constant in the sample, with at least one of the specified mental illnesses. The expenditure on prescription drugs for the specified mental illnesses differs between each of racial minorities (Blacks, Hispanics, and Asian-Indians) and Whites even after adjusting for the different likelihood of using those prescription drugs. Blacks, Hispanics, and Asian-Indians with the specified mental illnesses were estimated to spend 606.53 US dollars, 9.83 US dollars and 179.60 US dollars less per year, respectively, on their actual prescription drugs than Whites.

DISCUSSION

This study concludes that three racial minorities: Blacks, Hispanics, and Asian-Indians, with the specified mental illnesses are less likely to use psychiatric drugs than Whites. Among users, racial minorities use less psychiatric drugs than Whites in terms of actual spending on those drugs.

IMPLICATIONS FOR HEALTH CARE PROVISION AND USE

There is a need to focus on a program to reach out to racial minorities with a diagnosis of mental illnesses, and this program should consider the cultural specificity of each minority group regarding mental illnesses.

IMPLICATIONS FOR HEALTH POLICIES

In the development of mental health policy, it is crucial to understand the underlying non-socioeconomic factors which may significantly determine the access to mental health service. Also, education programs or other outreach programs for racial minorities are necessary to understand the different distribution of mental health services for racial minorities.

IMPLICATIONS FOR FURTHER RESEARCH

Future research should examine the causes for racial disparity in the use of prescription drugs for mental illness both in the extensive and intensive margins. An in-depth analysis is needed to map out the attributes for the observed disparity between Whites and racial minorities in mental health service use.

摘要

背景

少数族裔在美国人口中所占比例正在迅速增长。研究表明,由于贫困率较高等风险因素,少数族裔更容易患精神疾病。鉴于精神疾病的负担很重,平等利用心理健康服务的可能性对于减轻这种负担很重要。众所周知,少数族裔使用心理健康服务的频率低于白人。然而,在全国代表性样本中,精神疾病处方药使用方面的种族差异是否存在尚不清楚。为了有效估计处方药使用模式,估计模型应考虑处方药使用分布的特征。

研究目的

本研究旨在记录白人与三个少数族裔(黑人、西班牙裔和亚裔印度人)在精神药物使用的广度和强度方面是否存在差异。该研究考察了几种特定的精神疾病,并控制了潜在的健康状况和其他混杂因素。

方法

使用多年期医疗支出面板调查(MEPS)进行二次数据分析,该调查是1996年至2000年具有全国代表性的面板样本。本分析基于白人与其他少数族裔的比较,提供了本研究中患有特定精神疾病的人群处方药使用实际支出的估计值。我们从两部分模型中得出估计值,该框架在估计使用者中处方药的总实际支出时,调整使用特定精神疾病处方药的可能性。

结果

本研究发现,在样本中其他因素保持不变的情况下,患有至少一种特定精神疾病的黑人、西班牙裔和亚裔印度人使用处方药的可能性分别比白人低8.3、6.1和23.6个百分点。即使在调整了使用这些处方药的不同可能性之后,每个少数族裔(黑人、西班牙裔和亚裔印度人)与白人在特定精神疾病处方药支出方面仍存在差异。估计患有特定精神疾病的黑人、西班牙裔和亚裔印度人每年在实际处方药上的花费分别比白人少606.53美元、9.83美元和179.60美元。

讨论

本研究得出结论,患有特定精神疾病的三个少数族裔(黑人、西班牙裔和亚裔印度人)使用精神药物的可能性低于白人。在使用者中,少数族裔在这些药物的实际支出方面使用的精神药物比白人少。

对医疗保健提供和使用的启示

有必要关注一项针对被诊断患有精神疾病的少数族裔的项目,该项目应考虑每个少数族裔群体在精神疾病方面的文化特殊性。

对卫生政策的启示

在制定心理健康政策时,了解可能显著决定获得心理健康服务机会的潜在非社会经济因素至关重要。此外,针对少数族裔的教育项目或其他外展项目对于了解少数族裔心理健康服务的不同分布情况是必要的。

对进一步研究的启示

未来的研究应在广度和强度方面研究精神疾病处方药使用种族差异的原因。需要进行深入分析,以梳理出白人与少数族裔在心理健康服务使用方面观察到的差异的属性。

相似文献

1
Racial disparities in prescription drug use for mental illness among population in US.美国人群中用于治疗精神疾病的处方药使用方面的种族差异。
J Ment Health Policy Econ. 2005 Sep;8(3):131-43.
2
Are there racial disparities in psychotropic drug use and expenditures in a nationally representative sample of men in the United States? Evidence from the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey.在美国全国代表性的男性样本中,精神药物的使用和支出是否存在种族差异?来自医疗支出面板调查的证据。
Am J Mens Health. 2014 Jan;8(1):82-90. doi: 10.1177/1557988313496564. Epub 2013 Jul 24.
3
State-specific prevalence of selected health behaviors, by race and ethnicity--Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, 1997.按种族和族裔划分的特定州选定健康行为的患病率——行为风险因素监测系统,1997年
MMWR CDC Surveill Summ. 2000 Mar 24;49(2):1-60.
4
Racial/ethnic disparities among Asian Americans in inpatient acute myocardial infarction mortality in the United States.美国亚裔美国人住院急性心肌梗死死亡率的种族/族裔差异。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 May 16;18(1):370. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3180-0.
5
Racial and ethnic disparities in the financial burden of prescription drugs among older Americans.美国老年人在处方药经济负担方面的种族和族裔差异。
J Health Hum Serv Adm. 2007 Summer;30(1):28-49.
6
Potential Health Implications of Medication Therapy Management Eligibility Criteria in the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act Across Racial and Ethnic Groups.《平价医疗法案》中药物治疗管理资格标准对不同种族和族裔群体的潜在健康影响。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2015 Nov;21(11):993-1003. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2015.21.11.993.
7
Exploring racial and ethnic disparities in prescription drug spending and use among Medicare beneficiaries.探索医疗保险受益人群中处方药支出和使用方面的种族和族裔差异。
Am J Geriatr Pharmacother. 2006 Jun;4(2):96-111. doi: 10.1016/j.amjopharm.2006.06.008.
8
Racial/ethnic differences in perception of need for mental health treatment in a US national sample.美国全国样本中对心理健康治疗需求认知的种族/族裔差异。
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2017 Aug;52(8):929-937. doi: 10.1007/s00127-017-1400-2. Epub 2017 May 26.
9
Racial and ethnic differences in depressive subtypes and access to mental health care in the United States.美国不同种族和族裔在抑郁亚型和获得精神卫生保健方面的差异。
J Affect Disord. 2014 Feb;155:130-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2013.10.037. Epub 2013 Nov 5.
10
Ethnic and racial differences in mental health service utilization for suicidal ideation and behavior in a nationally representative sample of adolescents.全国代表性青少年样本中,关于自杀意念和行为的心理健康服务利用方面的种族和民族差异。
J Affect Disord. 2016 Sep 15;202:197-202. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2016.05.021. Epub 2016 May 27.

引用本文的文献

1
Did the COVID-19 pandemic influence the use of psychotropic medications by university students and LGBTQIAPN+? A Brazilian multicenter study.新冠疫情是否影响了大学生和LGBTQIAPN+群体使用精神药物的情况?一项巴西多中心研究。
Cad Saude Publica. 2025 Mar 24;41(3):e00231323. doi: 10.1590/0102-311XEN231323. eCollection 2025.
2
Early Life Disadvantage and the Risk of Depressive Symptoms among Young Black Women.早年生活劣势与年轻黑人女性抑郁症状风险之间的关系。
J Racial Ethn Health Disparities. 2024 Jun;11(3):1819-1828. doi: 10.1007/s40615-023-01654-x. Epub 2023 Jun 28.
3
Race, Affordability and Utilization of Supportive Care in Ovarian Cancer Patients.
种族、经济负担能力与卵巢癌患者支持性护理的利用。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2022 Dec;64(6):537-545. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2022.08.021. Epub 2022 Sep 2.
4
Centering Culture in Mental Health: Differences in Diagnosis, Treatment, and Access to Care Among Older People of Color.文化中心视角下的精神健康:有色人种老年人在诊断、治疗和获得护理方面的差异。
Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2022 Nov;30(11):1234-1251. doi: 10.1016/j.jagp.2022.07.001. Epub 2022 Jul 8.
5
The Need for Psychedelic-Assisted Therapy in the Black Community and the Burdens of Its Provision.黑人社区对迷幻辅助疗法的需求及其提供过程中的负担
Front Psychiatry. 2022 Jan 20;12:774736. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.774736. eCollection 2021.
6
Racial differences in posttraumatic stress disorder symptoms among African American and Caucasian male veterans.非裔美国男性退伍军人和白人男性退伍军人创伤后应激障碍症状的种族差异。
Traumatology (Tallahass Fla). 2019 Dec;25(4):297-302. doi: 10.1037/trm0000201. Epub 2019 May 13.
7
Psychotropic use patterns: Are there differences between men and women?精神活性物质使用模式:男性和女性之间是否存在差异?
PLoS One. 2018 Nov 26;13(11):e0207921. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0207921. eCollection 2018.
8
Beyond unequal access: Acculturation, race, and resistance to pharmaceuticalization in the United States.超越不平等的获取:美国的文化适应、种族与对药物化的抵制
SSM Popul Health. 2018 Apr 12;4:350-357. doi: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2018.04.003. eCollection 2018 Apr.
9
Race-Ethnicity and Prescription Drug Misuse: Does Self-esteem Matter?种族-族裔与处方药滥用:自尊重要吗?
J Child Adolesc Behav. 2015;3(5). doi: 10.4172/2375-4494.1000239. Epub 2015 Sep 3.
10
Impact of Medicare Part D on Racial and Ethnic Minorities.医疗保险处方药福利计划(Medicare Part D)对少数族裔的影响。
Divers Equal Health Care. 2016;13(5):326-333. Epub 2016 Aug 23.