Gaskin Darrell J, Briesacher Becky A, Limcangco Rhona, Brigantti Betsy L
Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA.
Am J Geriatr Pharmacother. 2006 Jun;4(2):96-111. doi: 10.1016/j.amjopharm.2006.06.008.
Little is known about why minority Medicare beneficiaries spend less on and use fewer prescription drugs than white Medicare beneficiaries.
We explored whether population differences in demographic characteristics, socioeconomic status, and health status were associated with observed disparities by race and ethnicity in the prescription drug spending and use of noninstitutionalized elderly Medicare beneficiaries.
We used a nationally representative sample of 8101 white, 816 black, and 642 Hispanic Medicare beneficiaries from the 1999 Medicare Current Beneficiary Survey Cost and Use files. For each of these groups, we calculated total prescription drug spending, out-of-pocket spending, and number of prescriptions. We then used the Oaxaca-Blinder decomposition method to separate the impact of race and ethnicity on disparities in spending and use from the impact of differences in population characteristics across racial and ethnic groups.
Much of the disparity in spending between whites and blacks and some of the disparity between whites and Hispanics can be attributed to race/ethnicity. Because of race/ethnicity, total spending for whites was 8.9% more than for blacks and 5.4% more than for Hispanics. Similarly, total out-of pocket spending for whites was 28.8% more than for blacks and 10.7% more than for Hispanics. Race/ethnicity also influenced the amount of prescription drug use. Whites used 2.3 more prescriptions than blacks and 1.6 more than Hispanics. However, these differences in use were offset by the impact of differences in population characteristics.
Differences in factors identified in the Andersen model of access to care do not fully explain observed disparities in prescription drug use and spending. The portion of the disparities due to race and ethnicity may reflect patients' skepticism about medicine and medical care in general, patients' adherence to medical advice, patient-physician communication, physicians' prescribing habits, and usual source of care. Future research should explore whether these and other unobserved factors associated with race and ethnicity are responsible for disparities in drug spending and use.
关于少数族裔医疗保险受益人与白人医疗保险受益人相比在处方药上花费更少且使用更少的原因,人们知之甚少。
我们探讨了非机构化老年医疗保险受益人的人口统计学特征、社会经济地位和健康状况方面的人群差异是否与按种族和族裔观察到的处方药支出和使用差异相关。
我们使用了来自1999年医疗保险当前受益人调查成本和使用文件的8101名白人、816名黑人以及642名西班牙裔医疗保险受益人的全国代表性样本。对于这些群体中的每一个,我们计算了处方药总支出、自付费用以及处方数量。然后我们使用奥瓦卡 - 布林德分解方法,将种族和族裔对支出和使用差异的影响与不同种族和族裔群体之间人口特征差异的影响区分开来。
白人与黑人之间支出差异的很大一部分以及白人与西班牙裔之间的部分差异可归因于种族/族裔。由于种族/族裔原因,白人的总支出比黑人多8.9%,比西班牙裔多5.4%。同样,白人的自付总费用比黑人多28.8%,比西班牙裔多10.7%。种族/族裔也影响了处方药的使用量。白人比黑人多使用2.3张处方,比西班牙裔多使用1.6张处方。然而,这些使用差异被人口特征差异的影响所抵消。
在安德森医疗服务可及性模型中确定的因素差异并不能完全解释观察到的处方药使用和支出差异。因种族和族裔导致的差异部分可能反映了患者对一般药物和医疗护理的怀疑态度、患者对医疗建议的依从性、医患沟通、医生的处方习惯以及通常的医疗服务来源。未来的研究应探讨这些以及其他与种族和族裔相关的未观察到的因素是否是药物支出和使用差异的原因。