Orchard John, Best Thomas M, Verrall George M
University of New South Wales, Adelaide, Australia.
Clin J Sport Med. 2005 Nov;15(6):436-41. doi: 10.1097/01.jsm.0000188206.54984.65.
To assess return to play strategies following muscle strains with the desired outcomes of decreased competition play lost and minimized risk for recurrent injury.
Literature review of previous studies that examine return to play criteria for the commonly seen muscle strain injuries in sport.
There have been no studies directly comparing different return to play approaches. Studies have instead concentrated on recurrence risk factors and prognosis assessment, particularly for hamstring injuries. There is some literature support for risk factors for recurrence such as persisting strength deficits, larger injuries seen on diagnostic imaging, players in high-risk positions or sports, inability to complete functional tasks without pain, and strains of specific high-risk muscles (biceps femoris, central tendon of rectus femoris, medial head of gastrocnemius, adductor longus or magnus).
There are no consensus guidelines or agreed-upon criteria for safe return to sport following muscle strains that completely eliminate the risk for recurrence and maximize performance. At this time, it may be a sensible strategy to allow earlier return to play in team sports and accept a low to moderate injury recurrence rate. Improved prognostic assessment of muscle strains with injury identification (MRI) and injury assessment (isokinetic testing) may be assist practitioners to lower, but not eliminate, recurrent injuries.
评估肌肉拉伤后的重返比赛策略,以期减少比赛缺失并将再次受伤的风险降至最低。
对先前研究进行文献综述,这些研究探讨了运动中常见肌肉拉伤的重返比赛标准。
尚无研究直接比较不同的重返比赛方法。相反,研究集中在复发风险因素和预后评估上,尤其是对腘绳肌损伤。对于复发风险因素,如持续的力量不足、诊断成像显示的较大损伤、处于高风险位置或从事高风险运动的运动员、无法无痛完成功能任务以及特定高风险肌肉(股二头肌、股直肌中央腱、腓肠肌内侧头、长收肌或大收肌)的拉伤,有一些文献支持。
对于肌肉拉伤后安全重返运动,尚无共识性指南或公认标准能完全消除复发风险并使表现最大化。此时,在团队运动中允许更早重返比赛并接受低至中度的损伤复发率可能是一种明智的策略。通过损伤识别(MRI)和损伤评估(等速测试)改善肌肉拉伤的预后评估,可能有助于从业者降低但无法消除再次受伤的情况。