Mihail Jeanne D, Bruhn Johann N
Division of Plant Sciences, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO 65211, USA.
Mycol Res. 2005 Nov;109(Pt 11):1195-207. doi: 10.1017/s0953756205003606.
The foraging behaviour of Armillaria rhizomorph systems is poorly understood owing to their cryptic position within the soil. We investigated foraging in a homogeneous environment (i.e. agar), finding that rhizomorph systems of the more parasitic species, A. mellea, A. ostoyae, and A. tabescens, lacked melanin and the approximately cylindrical cord-like form observed in the field. In contrast, rhizomorph systems of the more saprotrophic species, A. calvescens, A. gallica, and A. sinapina, developed radially resembling those in the field. For the three saprotrophic Armillaria species, the number of rhizomorph tips, total rhizomorph length and total rhizomorph surface area were significantly positively correlated with increasing rhizomorph system diameter and elapsed time in two developmental tests. However, the fractal dimension (D), used as a measure of foraging intensity, was temporally invariable, suggesting that one component of foraging behaviour is innate. In a heterogeneous environment (i.e. sand) and in the absence of a potential nutrient source, we observed that rhizomorph systems of A. gallica most often developed asymmetrically. While rhizomorph foraging was unresponsive to the lateral placement of an uncolonised stem segment, we were able to demonstrate directional growth toward an uncolonised Quercus velutina stem segment placed above or below the colonised source stem segment. When neighboring rhizomorph systems were conspecific genets of A. gallica, we observed that the growth of one rhizomorph system was directed toward zones unoccupied by its neighbour. However, the foraging intensity of the neighbouring genets, as measured by fractal dimension (D), was unaffected by the proximity of a neighbour. When neighbouring rhizomorph systems represented different species (A. gallica and A. mellea), A. gallica rhizomorph systems produced more total length and more foraging tips but concentrated their rhizomorph production away from the neighbouring A. mellea genet. In contrast, A. mellea rhizomorph systems produced significantly more foraging tips per unit length, both overall and in the zone of confrontation with the neighbouring A. gallica genet. Our observations are consistent with field observations of territoriality among Armillaria genets, and provide evidence that rhizomorph systems of more parasitic Armillaria spp. are able to compete effectively with the larger rhizomorph systems of more saprotrophic Armillaria species.
由于蜜环菌根状菌索系统位于土壤中难以察觉,其觅食行为鲜为人知。我们在均质环境(即琼脂)中对觅食行为进行了研究,发现寄生性更强的蜜环菌、奥氏蜜环菌和假蜜环菌的根状菌索系统缺乏黑色素,且没有在野外观察到的近似圆柱形的索状形态。相比之下,腐生性更强的小牛肝菌、高卢蜜环菌和芥黄蜜环菌的根状菌索系统呈放射状生长,与野外的相似。在两项发育测试中,对于三种腐生性蜜环菌,根状菌索尖端数量、根状菌索总长度和根状菌索总表面积均与根状菌索系统直径的增加和时间的推移呈显著正相关。然而,作为觅食强度度量的分形维数(D)在时间上是不变的,这表明觅食行为的一个组成部分是天生的。在异质环境(即沙子)中且没有潜在营养源的情况下,我们观察到高卢蜜环菌的根状菌索系统最常呈不对称发育。虽然根状菌索觅食对未定殖茎段的侧向放置没有反应,但我们能够证明其向放置在定殖源茎段上方或下方的未定殖的绒毛栎茎段定向生长。当相邻的根状菌索系统是高卢蜜环菌的同种基因型时,我们观察到一个根状菌索系统的生长方向是其邻居未占据的区域。然而,通过分形维数(D)测量的相邻基因型的觅食强度不受邻居接近程度的影响。当相邻的根状菌索系统代表不同物种(高卢蜜环菌和蜜环菌)时,高卢蜜环菌的根状菌索系统产生的总长度和觅食尖端更多,但将其根状菌索的生长集中在远离相邻蜜环菌基因型的地方。相比之下,蜜环菌的根状菌索系统在总体上以及与相邻高卢蜜环菌基因型对峙的区域中,每单位长度产生的觅食尖端明显更多。我们的观察结果与蜜环菌基因型之间领地性的野外观察结果一致,并提供了证据表明寄生性更强的蜜环菌物种的根状菌索系统能够与腐生性更强的蜜环菌物种更大的根状菌索系统有效竞争。