Mrus Joseph M, Braun LeeAnn, Yi Michael S, Linde-Zwirble Walter T, Johnston Joseph A
Health Services Research and Development, Cincinnati VA Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA.
Crit Care. 2005;9(6):R623-30. doi: 10.1186/cc3811. Epub 2005 Sep 27.
There has been dramatic improvement in survival for patients with HIV/AIDS; however, some studies on patients with HIV/AIDS and serious illness have reported continued low rates of intensive care. The purpose of this study was to examine patterns of care and outcomes for patients with severe sepsis and HIV/AIDS and compare them with those of patients with severe sepsis without HIV/AIDS.
We assessed data from all 1999 discharge abstracts from all non-federal hospitals in six US states. Patient demographic characteristics, discharge diagnoses, resource use, and outcomes were extracted. Analyses were performed using chi-square, Wilcoxon rank sum, or regression techniques, as appropriate.
We identified 74,020 patients with severe sepsis (7,638 (10.3%) had HIV/AIDS) using ICD-9-CM codes. Patients with severe sepsis and HIV/AIDS had a similar mean length of stay (16.9 days versus 17.7 days; p = 0.0669), had lower mean hospitalization cost (24,382 dollars versus 30,537 dollars; p < 0.0001), were less likely to be admitted to the intensive care unit (37% versus 56%; p < 0.0001), and had a greater mortality (29% versus 20%; p < 0.0001) than those without HIV/AIDS. After adjustment for cohort differences, patients with severe sepsis and HIV/AIDS had increased likelihood of death (OR (95% CI) = 2.41 (2.23-2.61)) and were substantially less likely to be admitted to the intensive care unit (OR (95% CI) = 0.54 (0.51-0.59)). When compared with those with severe sepsis and HIV/AIDS, patients with severe sepsis without HIV/AIDS were universally more likely to be admitted to the intensive care unit, even when they had comorbid illnesses with equal or worse expected in-hospital mortality (e.g., metastatic cancer).
For patients with severe sepsis, there are differences in care and outcomes for those with HIV/AIDS. Further research is needed to examine the delivery of care for patients with severe sepsis and HIV/AIDS.
艾滋病毒/艾滋病患者的生存率有了显著提高;然而,一些针对艾滋病毒/艾滋病合并重症患者的研究报告称,重症监护的使用率仍然很低。本研究的目的是调查重症脓毒症合并艾滋病毒/艾滋病患者的护理模式和结局,并将其与未感染艾滋病毒/艾滋病的重症脓毒症患者进行比较。
我们评估了美国六个州所有非联邦医院1999年所有出院摘要中的数据。提取了患者的人口统计学特征、出院诊断、资源使用情况和结局。根据情况,使用卡方检验、威尔科克森秩和检验或回归技术进行分析。
我们使用ICD-9-CM编码识别出74020例重症脓毒症患者(7638例(10.3%)感染艾滋病毒/艾滋病)。重症脓毒症合并艾滋病毒/艾滋病患者的平均住院时间相似(16.9天对17.7天;p = 0.0669),平均住院费用较低(24382美元对30537美元;p < 0.0001),入住重症监护病房的可能性较小(37%对56%;p < 0.0001),死亡率更高(29%对20%;p < 0.0001)。在对队列差异进行调整后,重症脓毒症合并艾滋病毒/艾滋病患者的死亡可能性增加(比值比(95%置信区间)= 2. (2.23 - 2.61)),入住重症监护病房的可能性显著降低(比值比(95%置信区间)= 0.54 (0.51 - 0.59))。与重症脓毒症合并艾滋病毒/艾滋病患者相比,未感染艾滋病毒/艾滋病的重症脓毒症患者普遍更有可能入住重症监护病房,即使他们患有预期院内死亡率相同或更高的合并症(如转移性癌症)。
对于重症脓毒症患者,感染艾滋病毒/艾滋病的患者在护理和结局方面存在差异。需要进一步研究以调查重症脓毒症合并艾滋病毒/艾滋病患者的护理提供情况。