Hobart J C, Riazi A, Thompson A J, Styles I M, Ingram W, Vickery P J, Warner M, Fox P J, Zajicek J P
Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Peninsula Medical School, Plymouth, Devon, UK.
Brain. 2006 Jan;129(Pt 1):224-34. doi: 10.1093/brain/awh675. Epub 2005 Nov 9.
Spasticity is most commonly defined as an inappropriate, velocity dependent, increase in muscle tonic stretch reflexes, due to the amplified reactivity of motor segments to sensory input. It forms one component of the upper motor neuron syndrome and often leads to muscle stiffness and disability. Spasticity can, therefore, be measured through electrophysiological, biomechanical and clinical evaluation, the last most commonly using the Ashworth scale. None of these techniques incorporate the patient experience of spasticity, nor how it affects people's daily lives. Consequently, we set out to construct a rating scale to quantify the perspectives of the impact of spasticity on people with multiple sclerosis. Qualitative methods (in-depth patient interviews and focus groups, expert opinion and literature review) were used to develop a conceptual framework of spasticity impact, and to generate a pool of items with the potential to convert this framework into a rating scale with multiple dimensions. This item pool was administered, in the form of a questionnaire, to a sample of people with multiple sclerosis and spasticity. Guided by Rasch analysis, we constructed and validated a rating scale for each component of the conceptual framework. Decisions regarding item selection were based on the integration and assimilation of seven specific analyses including clinical meaning, ordering of thresholds, fit statistics and differential item functioning. The qualitative phase (17 patient interviews, 3 focus groups) generated 144 potential scale items and a conceptual model with eight components addressing symptoms (muscle stiffness, pain and discomfort and muscle spasms,), physical impact (activities of daily living, walking and body movements) and psychosocial impact (emotional health, social functioning). The first postal survey was sent to 272 people with multiple sclerosis and had a response rate of 88%. Findings supported the development of scales for each component but demonstrated that five item response options were too many. The 144-item questionnaire, reformatted with four-item response options, was administered with four validating instruments to an independent sample of 259 people with multiple sclerosis (response rate 78%). From the responses, an 88-item instrument with eight subscales was developed that satisfied criteria for reliable and valid measurement. Correlations with other measures were consistent with predictions. The 88-item Multiple Sclerosis Spasticity Scale (MSSS-88) is a reliable and valid, patient-based, interval-level measure of the impact of spasticity in multiple sclerosis. It has the potential to advance outcomes measurement in clinical trials and clinical practice, and provides a new perspective in the clinical evaluation of spasticity.
痉挛最常被定义为由于运动节段对感觉输入的反应性增强,导致不适当的、与速度相关的肌肉紧张性牵张反射增加。它是上运动神经元综合征的一个组成部分,常导致肌肉僵硬和残疾。因此,痉挛可通过电生理、生物力学和临床评估来测量,临床评估最常用的是Ashworth量表。这些技术都没有纳入患者对痉挛的体验,也没有考虑它如何影响人们的日常生活。因此,我们着手构建一个评分量表,以量化痉挛对多发性硬化症患者影响的观点。采用定性方法(深入的患者访谈和焦点小组讨论、专家意见和文献综述)来构建痉挛影响的概念框架,并生成一系列有可能将该框架转化为多维度评分量表的条目。这个条目库以问卷的形式发放给一组患有多发性硬化症且有痉挛症状的患者。在Rasch分析的指导下,我们为概念框架的每个组成部分构建并验证了一个评分量表。关于条目的选择是基于七种具体分析的整合和同化,包括临床意义、阈值排序、拟合统计和项目功能差异分析。定性阶段(17次患者访谈、3次焦点小组讨论)产生了144个潜在的量表条目和一个概念模型,该模型有八个组成部分,涉及症状(肌肉僵硬、疼痛和不适以及肌肉痉挛)、身体影响(日常生活活动、行走和身体运动)和心理社会影响(情绪健康、社会功能)。第一次邮寄调查发送给了272名多发性硬化症患者,回复率为88%。研究结果支持为每个组成部分开发量表,但表明五个条目反应选项太多。重新格式化为四个条目反应选项的144条目问卷,与四个验证工具一起发放给259名多发性硬化症患者的独立样本(回复率78%)。根据回复,开发了一个包含八个子量表的88条目工具,该工具满足可靠和有效测量的标准。与其他测量方法的相关性与预测一致。88条目多发性硬化症痉挛量表(MSSS - 88)是一种基于患者的、可靠且有效的、用于测量痉挛对多发性硬化症影响的等距水平测量工具。它有可能推动临床试验和临床实践中的结果测量,并为痉挛的临床评估提供一个新的视角。