Lynch Michael
Department of Biology, Indiana University, Bloomington, USA.
Mol Biol Evol. 2006 Feb;23(2):450-68. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msj050. Epub 2005 Nov 9.
Most of the phenotypic diversity that we perceive in the natural world is directly attributable to the peculiar structure of the eukaryotic gene, which harbors numerous embellishments relative to the situation in prokaryotes. The most profound changes include introns that must be spliced out of precursor mRNAs, transcribed but untranslated leader and trailer sequences (untranslated regions), modular regulatory elements that drive patterns of gene expression, and expansive intergenic regions that harbor additional diffuse control mechanisms. Explaining the origins of these features is difficult because they each impose an intrinsic disadvantage by increasing the genic mutation rate to defective alleles. To address these issues, a general hypothesis for the emergence of eukaryotic gene structure is provided here. Extensive information on absolute population sizes, recombination rates, and mutation rates strongly supports the view that eukaryotes have reduced genetic effective population sizes relative to prokaryotes, with especially extreme reductions being the rule in multicellular lineages. The resultant increase in the power of random genetic drift appears to be sufficient to overwhelm the weak mutational disadvantages associated with most novel aspects of the eukaryotic gene, supporting the idea that most such changes are simple outcomes of semi-neutral processes rather than direct products of natural selection. However, by establishing an essentially permanent change in the population-genetic environment permissive to the genome-wide repatterning of gene structure, the eukaryotic condition also promoted a reliable resource from which natural selection could secondarily build novel forms of organismal complexity. Under this hypothesis, arguments based on molecular, cellular, and/or physiological constraints are insufficient to explain the disparities in gene, genomic, and phenotypic complexity between prokaryotes and eukaryotes.
我们在自然界中所感知到的大多数表型多样性都直接归因于真核基因的特殊结构,相对于原核生物的情况,真核基因具有众多修饰。最深刻的变化包括必须从前体mRNA中剪接出去的内含子、转录但未翻译的前导和尾随序列(非翻译区)、驱动基因表达模式的模块化调控元件,以及包含额外扩散控制机制的广阔基因间区域。解释这些特征的起源很困难,因为它们各自都会因增加产生缺陷等位基因的基因突变率而带来内在劣势。为了解决这些问题,本文提出了一个关于真核基因结构出现的一般假说。关于绝对种群大小、重组率和突变率的广泛信息有力地支持了这样一种观点,即真核生物相对于原核生物而言,其遗传有效种群大小有所减少,在多细胞谱系中尤其会出现极端减少的情况。随机遗传漂变能力的相应增加似乎足以压倒与真核基因大多数新特征相关的微弱突变劣势,这支持了这样一种观点,即大多数此类变化是半中性过程的简单结果,而非自然选择的直接产物。然而,通过在允许基因结构进行全基因组重新排列的种群遗传环境中建立一种基本永久性的变化,真核生物状态也促进了一种可靠的资源,自然选择可以在此基础上进而构建新的生物复杂性形式。根据这一假说,基于分子、细胞和/或生理限制的论据不足以解释原核生物和真核生物在基因、基因组和表型复杂性上的差异。