Suppr超能文献

在48周内,将阿巴卡韦与拉米夫定固定剂量复方片剂每日一次给药与阿巴卡韦与拉米夫定每日两次给药用于HIV感染患者的疗效进行比较(ESS30008,SEAL研究) 。

Abacavir and lamivudine fixed-dose combination tablet once daily compared with abacavir and lamivudine twice daily in HIV-infected patients over 48 weeks (ESS30008, SEAL).

作者信息

Sosa Nestor, Hill-Zabala Christina, Dejesus Edwin, Herrera Gisella, Florance Allison, Watson Maria, Vavro Cindy, Shaefer Mark

机构信息

Social Security Hospital, Panama City, Panama.

出版信息

J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2005 Dec 1;40(4):422-7. doi: 10.1097/01.qai.0000184859.24071.bd.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Abacavir (ABC) and lamivudine (3TC) administered twice daily were compared with an ABC + 3TC fixed-dose combination (Epzicom, Kivexa; EPZ) administered once daily, both in combination with a protease inhibitor (PI) or nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI).

METHODS

Two hundred sixty HIV-infected subjects with more than 6 months of ABC and 3TC administered twice daily plus a PI or NNRTI with an HIV-1 RNA level less than 400 copies/mL for more than 3 months and a CD4 count greater than 50 cells/mm were randomized 1:1 to ABC + 3TC administered twice daily or EPZ administered once daily.

RESULTS

At baseline, median time on ABC and 3TC administered twice daily was 22 months, and median CD4 count and HIV-1 RNA level were 554 cells/mm and <50 copies/mL, respectively. EPZ administered once daily was established as not inferior to ABC + 3TC administered twice daily based on the proportion of nonvirologic failures (confirmed HIV-1 RNA level > or =1265 copies/mL; 90% confidence interval: -3.4 to 6.4; (intent to treat [ITT]: missing [M] = failure [F]). Proportions with an HIV-1 RNA level <50 copies/mL were 81% of those taking EPZ once daily and 82% of those taking ABC + 3TC twice daily at week 48 (ITT: M = F). Virologic failure was rare (2 patients taking the once-daily regimen, 4 patients taking the twice-daily regimen). There was a low incidence of grade 2 through 4 adverse events (AEs) and no drug-related serious AEs or hypersensitivity reactions.

CONCLUSIONS

EPZ administered once daily was established as not inferior to ABC + 3TC administered twice daily in a regimen containing an NNRTI or a PI over 48 weeks. A dual-nucleoside backbone of ABC and 3TC administered once or twice daily is effective, durable, and well tolerated.

摘要

背景

将每日两次服用的阿巴卡韦(ABC)和拉米夫定(3TC)与每日一次服用的ABC + 3TC固定剂量复方制剂(依非韦伦/拉米夫定片,Kivexa;EPZ)进行比较,二者均与蛋白酶抑制剂(PI)或非核苷类逆转录酶抑制剂(NNRTI)联合使用。

方法

260名感染HIV的受试者,每日两次服用ABC和3TC超过6个月,同时联合PI或NNRTI,HIV-1 RNA水平低于400拷贝/mL超过3个月,CD4细胞计数大于50个/mm³,将其按1:1随机分为每日两次服用ABC + 3TC组或每日一次服用EPZ组。

结果

基线时,每日两次服用ABC和3TC的中位时间为22个月,中位CD4细胞计数和HIV-1 RNA水平分别为554个/mm³和<50拷贝/mL。基于非病毒学失败的比例(确认的HIV-1 RNA水平>或=1265拷贝/mL;90%置信区间:-3.4至6.4;(意向性治疗[ITT]:缺失[M]=失败[F]),确定每日一次服用EPZ不劣于每日两次服用ABC + 3TC。在第48周时,HIV-1 RNA水平<50拷贝/mL的比例在每日一次服用EPZ的受试者中为81%,在每日两次服用ABC + 3TC的受试者中为82%(ITT:M = F)。病毒学失败罕见(每日一次给药方案组2例患者,每日两次给药方案组4例患者)。2至4级不良事件(AE)的发生率较低,未出现与药物相关的严重AE或过敏反应。

结论

在含有NNRTI或PI的方案中,每日一次服用EPZ在48周内被确定不劣于每日两次服用ABC + 3TC。每日一次或两次服用的ABC和3TC双核苷主干有效、持久且耐受性良好。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验