Goodman Steven N, Sladky John T
Department of Oncology, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine and Public Health, USA.
Clin Trials. 2005;2(4):305-10; discussion 364-78. doi: 10.1191/1740774505cn102oa.
Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) is a rare neurologic disease that occurs at all ages, causing a progressive, ascending paralysis that usually resolves over weeks or months. The disease appears to be identical in children and adults, except that children recover more quickly, with fewer residua. For patients who lose the ability to walk independently, the main treatment options are plasmapheresis or intravenous immune globulin (IVIg), treatments that have shown to have identical effectiveness in adults in two large RCTs involving 388 patients. The effectiveness of the treatments in children has only been studied in small, poorly controlled studies. If one could capture all eligible patients in the United States, only about 100-300 children would be available for a trial annually.
The goal of this case was to demonstrate how Bayesian methods could be used to incorporate prior information on treatment efficacy from adults to design a randomized noninferiority trial of IVIg versus plasmapheresis in children. A Bayesian normal-normal model on the hazard ratio of time to independent walking was implemented.
An evidence-based prior was constructed that was equivalent to 72 children showing exact equivalence between the therapies. A design was constructed based on a Bayesian normal-normal model on the hazard ratio, yielding a sample size of 160 children, with a preposterior analysis demonstrating a "Type I" error rate of 5% and a power of 77%.
This case study illustrates a rational approach to constructing an evidence-based prior that would allow information from adults to formally augment data from children to minimize unnecessary pediatric experimentation. The frequentist properties of a Bayesian design can be evaluated and reported as they would be for a standard design. Discussion of the appropriate prior for such designs is both a necessary and desirable feature of Bayesian trials.
吉兰 - 巴雷综合征(GBS)是一种罕见的神经系统疾病,可发生于各年龄段,导致进行性、上行性麻痹,通常在数周或数月内缓解。该疾病在儿童和成人中表现似乎相同,只是儿童恢复更快,后遗症更少。对于失去独立行走能力的患者,主要治疗选择是血浆置换或静脉注射免疫球蛋白(IVIg),在两项涉及388名患者的大型随机对照试验中,这两种治疗方法在成人中显示出相同的疗效。这些治疗方法在儿童中的有效性仅在小型、控制不佳的研究中进行过探讨。如果能够纳入美国所有符合条件的患者,每年仅有约100 - 300名儿童可用于试验。
本案例的目的是展示如何使用贝叶斯方法纳入来自成人的治疗疗效先验信息,以设计一项针对儿童的IVIg与血浆置换的随机非劣效性试验。实施了一个关于独立行走时间风险比的贝叶斯正态 - 正态模型。
构建了一个基于证据的先验,相当于72名儿童显示两种疗法完全等效。基于风险比的贝叶斯正态 - 正态模型构建了一个设计,得出样本量为160名儿童,事前分析显示“Ⅰ类”错误率为5%,检验效能为77%。
本案例研究说明了一种构建基于证据的先验的合理方法,该方法可使来自成人的信息正式增强来自儿童的数据,以尽量减少不必要的儿科实验。贝叶斯设计的频率特性可以像标准设计那样进行评估和报告。讨论此类设计的适当先验是贝叶斯试验的必要且可取的特征。