Suppr超能文献

使用经验贝叶斯方法,借助具有历史偏差的先验进行借取。

Borrowing using historical-bias power prior with empirical Bayes.

作者信息

Lin Hsin-Yu, Slate Elizabeth

机构信息

Department of Statistics, Florida State University, Tallahassee, USA.

出版信息

J Biopharm Stat. 2024 Dec 8:1-31. doi: 10.1080/10543406.2024.2429461.

Abstract

Adaptively incorporating historical information into analyses of current data can improve the precision of inference without requiring additional new observation. Unfortunately, not all borrowing methods are suitable when limited historical studies are available. When a single historical study is available, the power priors control the amount of information to borrow via specification of a weight parameter that discounts the contribution of the historical data in a likelihood combined with current data. We develop a new type of conditional power prior called the historical-bias power prior using an empirical Bayes approach. It relaxes the assumption of the traditional power priors to allow for historical bias. Moreover, our new weight function controls the amount of borrowing and only borrows when historical data satisfy the borrowing criteria. This is achieved by embedding the Frequentist test-then-pool approach in the weight function. Hence, the historical-bias power prior builds a bridge between the Frequentist test-then-pool and the Bayesian power prior. In the simulation, we examine the impact of historical bias on the operating characteristics for borrowing approaches, which has not been discussed in previous literature. The results show that the historical-bias power prior yields accurate estimation and robustly powerful tests for the experimental treatment effect with good type I error control, especially when historical bias exists.

摘要

在当前数据分析中自适应地纳入历史信息可以提高推断的精度,而无需额外的新观测。不幸的是,当可用的历史研究有限时,并非所有的借用方法都适用。当只有一项历史研究可用时,功率先验通过指定一个权重参数来控制借用的信息量,该参数会在结合当前数据的似然中对历史数据的贡献进行折扣。我们使用经验贝叶斯方法开发了一种新型的条件功率先验,称为历史偏差功率先验。它放宽了传统功率先验的假设,以允许存在历史偏差。此外,我们的新权重函数控制借用的信息量,并且仅在历史数据满足借用标准时才进行借用。这是通过在权重函数中嵌入频率主义者先检验后合并的方法来实现的。因此,历史偏差功率先验在频率主义者先检验后合并和贝叶斯功率先验之间架起了一座桥梁。在模拟中,我们研究了历史偏差对借用方法操作特性的影响,这在以前的文献中尚未讨论过。结果表明历史偏差功率先验能够对实验治疗效果进行准确估计和稳健有力的检验,同时具有良好的I型错误控制,特别是在存在历史偏差的情况下。

相似文献

1
Borrowing using historical-bias power prior with empirical Bayes.
J Biopharm Stat. 2024 Dec 8:1-31. doi: 10.1080/10543406.2024.2429461.
3
Bayesian hypothesis testing with frequentist characteristics in clinical trials.
Contemp Clin Trials. 2019 Dec;87:105858. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2019.105858. Epub 2019 Oct 24.
4
Comparison of Borrowing Methods for Incorporating Historical Data in Single-Arm Phase II Clinical Trials.
Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2025 Jan;59(1):20-30. doi: 10.1007/s43441-024-00723-5. Epub 2024 Nov 21.
5
Elastic priors to dynamically borrow information from historical data in clinical trials.
Biometrics. 2023 Mar;79(1):49-60. doi: 10.1111/biom.13551. Epub 2021 Sep 20.
6
Bayesian Dynamic Borrowing of Historical Information with Applications to the Analysis of Large-Scale Assessments.
Psychometrika. 2023 Mar;88(1):1-30. doi: 10.1007/s11336-022-09869-3. Epub 2022 Jun 10.
7
Dynamic borrowing from a single prior data source using the conditional power prior.
J Biopharm Stat. 2021 Jul 4;31(4):403-424. doi: 10.1080/10543406.2021.1895190.
8
Bayesian adaptive randomization design incorporating propensity score-matched historical controls.
Pharm Stat. 2022 Sep;21(5):1074-1089. doi: 10.1002/pst.2203. Epub 2022 Mar 12.
10
Bayesian semiparametric meta-analytic-predictive prior for historical control borrowing in clinical trials.
Stat Med. 2021 Jun 30;40(14):3385-3399. doi: 10.1002/sim.8970. Epub 2021 Apr 13.

本文引用的文献

1
Incidence of Guillain-Barré syndrome in the world between 1985 and 2020: A systematic review.
Glob Epidemiol. 2023 Jan 11;5:100098. doi: 10.1016/j.gloepi.2023.100098. eCollection 2023 Dec.
3
Bayesian clinical trial design using historical data that inform the treatment effect.
Biostatistics. 2019 Jul 1;20(3):400-415. doi: 10.1093/biostatistics/kxy009.
4
Adaptive power priors with empirical Bayes for clinical trials.
Pharm Stat. 2017 Sep;16(5):349-360. doi: 10.1002/pst.1814. Epub 2017 Jun 2.
5
Including historical data in the analysis of clinical trials: Is it worth the effort?
Stat Methods Med Res. 2018 Oct;27(10):3167-3182. doi: 10.1177/0962280217694506. Epub 2017 Feb 21.
6
Addressing prior-data conflict with empirical meta-analytic-predictive priors in clinical studies with historical information.
J Biopharm Stat. 2016;26(6):1056-1066. doi: 10.1080/10543406.2016.1226324. Epub 2016 Aug 19.
7
COMBINING NONEXCHANGEABLE FUNCTIONAL OR SURVIVAL DATA SOURCES IN ONCOLOGY USING GENERALIZED MIXTURE COMMENSURATE PRIORS.
Ann Appl Stat. 2015 Sep;9(3):1549-1570. doi: 10.1214/15-AOAS840. Epub 2015 Nov 2.
8
Robust meta-analytic-predictive priors in clinical trials with historical control information.
Biometrics. 2014 Dec;70(4):1023-32. doi: 10.1111/biom.12242. Epub 2014 Oct 29.
10
Use of historical control data for assessing treatment effects in clinical trials.
Pharm Stat. 2014 Jan-Feb;13(1):41-54. doi: 10.1002/pst.1589. Epub 2013 Aug 5.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验