Dannon Pinhas N, Lowengrub Katherine, Musin Ernest, Gonopolski Yehudit, Kotler Moshe
The Rehovot Community Mental Health and Rehabilitation Center, affiliated with Ness Ziona Medical Center and Tel Aviv University, Rehovot, Israel.
J Clin Psychopharmacol. 2005 Dec;25(6):593-6. doi: 10.1097/01.jcp.0000186867.90289.ed.
Pathological gambling (PG) is a relatively common and highly disabling impulse control disorder. A range of psychotherapeutic agents, including selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, mood stabilizers, and opioid antagonists, has been shown to be effective in the treatment of PG. The use of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors and opioid antagonists for PG is consistent with the observation that PG shares features of both the obsessive-compulsive spectrum disorders and addictive disorders. The aim of the study is to compare the effectiveness of sustained-release bupropion versus naltrexone in the treatment of PG.
Thirty-six male pathological gamblers were enrolled in our study. A comprehensive psychiatric diagnostic evaluation was performed at baseline on all patients, and patients were screened for symptoms of gambling, depression, and anxiety using the South Oaks Gambling Screen, the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale, the Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale, and the Clinical Global Impression-Severity Scale. In addition, the patients completed self-report questionnaires about their demographic status. Patients were randomized in 2 groups and received either naltrexone (n = 19) or sustained-release bupropion (n = 17) for 12 weeks in a parallel fashion. Treatment response was monitored using the Clinical Global Impression-Improvement Scale which was performed at weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12. Patients were also assessed for the presence of gambling behavior via an unstructured interview, which was also performed at weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, and 12. Raters were blind to the study treatment.
The majority of patients responded well to the drug treatment. Twelve of 17 patients in the sustained-release bupropion group completed the 12-week study, and 13 of 19 naltrexone patients completed the study. Nine (75%) of the 12 completers were rated as full responders in the sustained-release bupropion group versus 10 (76%) of 12 in the naltrexone group. Three (25%) of 12 completers in the bupropion group were rated as partial responders. In the naltrexone group, 3 (23%) of 13 completers were rated as partial responders. Full response was defined as the absence of gambling for a 2-week duration together with improvement on the Clinical Global Impression-Improvement Scale. Partial response was defined as a decrease in the frequency of gambling behavior and a decrease in the amount of money spent on gambling.
This preliminary study shows that sustained-release bupropion may be effective as naltrexone in the treatment of PG. Further studies are needed to confirm our findings.
病理性赌博(PG)是一种相对常见且严重致残的冲动控制障碍。一系列心理治疗药物,包括选择性5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂、心境稳定剂和阿片类拮抗剂,已被证明对PG治疗有效。选择性5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂和阿片类拮抗剂用于PG治疗,与PG兼具强迫谱系障碍和成瘾性障碍特征的观察结果相符。本研究旨在比较缓释安非他酮与纳曲酮治疗PG的有效性。
36名男性病理性赌博者纳入本研究。对所有患者在基线时进行全面的精神科诊断评估,使用南橡树赌博筛查量表、汉密尔顿抑郁评定量表、汉密尔顿焦虑评定量表和临床总体印象-严重程度量表对患者的赌博、抑郁和焦虑症状进行筛查。此外,患者完成关于其人口统计学状况的自我报告问卷。患者被随机分为两组,以平行方式接受纳曲酮(n = 19)或缓释安非他酮(n = 17)治疗12周。使用在第2、4、8和12周进行的临床总体印象-改善量表监测治疗反应。还通过非结构化访谈评估患者在第2、4、6、8和12周时是否存在赌博行为。评估者对研究治疗情况不知情。
大多数患者对药物治疗反应良好。缓释安非他酮组17名患者中有12名完成了12周的研究,纳曲酮组19名患者中有13名完成了研究。缓释安非他酮组12名完成者中有9名(75%)被评为完全缓解者,而纳曲酮组12名中有10名(76%)。安非他酮组12名完成者中有3名(25%)被评为部分缓解者。在纳曲酮组,13名完成者中有3名(23%)被评为部分缓解者。完全缓解定义为连续2周无赌博行为且临床总体印象-改善量表得分有所改善。部分缓解定义为赌博行为频率降低以及赌博支出金额减少。
这项初步研究表明,缓释安非他酮在治疗PG方面可能与纳曲酮一样有效。需要进一步研究来证实我们的发现。