• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

阿片类拮抗剂在赌博障碍药物治疗中的作用:它们是否相关?

Opioid Antagonists for Pharmacological Treatment of Gambling Disorder: Are they Relevant?

机构信息

Pharmacology Department, Nantes University Hospital, Nantes, France.

INSERM UMR1246 SPHERE Methods in Patients-centered outcomes and Health Research, University of Nantes and Tours, Nantes, France.

出版信息

Curr Neuropharmacol. 2018;16(10):1418-1432. doi: 10.2174/1570159X15666170718144058.

DOI:10.2174/1570159X15666170718144058
PMID:28721822
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6295935/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

To date, no drugs have been approved for gambling disorder. Numerous publications have described the value of opioid antagonists. Indeed, the mesocorticolimbic dopaminergic pathway has been suggested as the underlying cause of reward-seeking behaviour, and it is modulated by the opioid system.

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to evaluate the relevance of opioid antagonists for treating GD.

METHOD

A systematic literature review was conducted. A search of the PubMed electronic database, PsycINFO and the Cochrane Systematic Review Database without any limits was performed.

RESULTS

There is little information concerning the effects of opioid antagonists on GD. The total search with "nalmefene and gambling" without any limits revealed only 11 articles. The search with "naltrexone and gambling" without any limits generated 47 articles. Nevertheless, the best available data support the use of opioid antagonists, particularly in individuals with a history of alcohol use disorder or strong gambling urges.

CONCLUSION

Future trials are still needed. Indeed, opioid antagonists effectiveness has been investigated in only a limited number of patients, clinical trials do not reflect the heterogeneity of GD and there is little knowledge of the predictive factors of response to treatments. Moreover, differential affinity to nalmefene for kappa receptors may be associated with a particular effect in a yet to be defined addiction phenotype. Head to head comparisons between naltrexone and nalmefene would be helpful in combining other medication or psychotherapy. The identification of subgroups of patients that are more likely to benefit from opioid antagonists should be a goal.

摘要

背景

迄今为止,尚无药物被批准用于治疗赌博障碍。大量出版物已经描述了阿片类拮抗剂的价值。事实上,中脑边缘多巴胺能通路被认为是寻求奖励行为的潜在原因,并且它受阿片系统的调节。

目的

本研究旨在评估阿片类拮抗剂治疗 GD 的相关性。

方法

进行了系统的文献回顾。对 PubMed 电子数据库、PsycINFO 和 Cochrane 系统评价数据库进行了无限制的搜索。

结果

关于阿片类拮抗剂对 GD 的影响的信息很少。总搜索“nalmefene 和赌博”无限制仅显示了 11 篇文章。搜索“naltrexone 和赌博”无限制生成了 47 篇文章。然而,最好的现有数据支持使用阿片类拮抗剂,特别是在有酒精使用障碍或强烈赌博冲动史的个体中。

结论

仍需要进一步的试验。实际上,阿片类拮抗剂的有效性仅在有限数量的患者中进行了研究,临床试验不能反映 GD 的异质性,并且对治疗反应的预测因素知之甚少。此外,κ 受体对纳美芬的不同亲和力可能与尚未定义的成瘾表型中的特定作用相关。纳曲酮和纳美芬之间的头对头比较将有助于结合其他药物或心理治疗。确定更有可能从阿片类拮抗剂中受益的患者亚组应是一个目标。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6918/6295935/632889749f15/CN-16-1418_F1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6918/6295935/632889749f15/CN-16-1418_F1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6918/6295935/632889749f15/CN-16-1418_F1.jpg

相似文献

1
Opioid Antagonists for Pharmacological Treatment of Gambling Disorder: Are they Relevant?阿片类拮抗剂在赌博障碍药物治疗中的作用:它们是否相关?
Curr Neuropharmacol. 2018;16(10):1418-1432. doi: 10.2174/1570159X15666170718144058.
2
Pharmacological interventions for the treatment of disordered and problem gambling.药物干预治疗障碍性及问题性赌博
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Sep 22;9(9):CD008936. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008936.pub2.
3
Opioid antagonists for alcohol dependence.用于酒精依赖的阿片类拮抗剂。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2002(2):CD001867. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001867.
4
Oral naltrexone as a treatment for relapse prevention in formerly opioid-dependent drug users: a systematic review and economic evaluation.口服纳曲酮用于预防曾对阿片类药物依赖的吸毒者复吸:一项系统评价与经济学评估
Health Technol Assess. 2007 Feb;11(6):iii-iv, 1-85. doi: 10.3310/hta11060.
5
A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of paclitaxel, docetaxel, gemcitabine and vinorelbine in non-small-cell lung cancer.对紫杉醇、多西他赛、吉西他滨和长春瑞滨在非小细胞肺癌中的临床疗效和成本效益进行的快速系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(32):1-195. doi: 10.3310/hta5320.
6
Opioid antagonists for alcohol dependence.用于酒精依赖的阿片类拮抗剂。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2000(3):CD001867. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001867.
7
Comparison of the effectiveness of inhaler devices in asthma and chronic obstructive airways disease: a systematic review of the literature.吸入装置在哮喘和慢性阻塞性气道疾病中的有效性比较:文献系统评价
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(26):1-149. doi: 10.3310/hta5260.
8
Mu-opioid antagonists for opioid-induced bowel dysfunction in people with cancer and people receiving palliative care.用于癌症患者和接受姑息治疗患者的阿片类药物引起的肠道功能障碍的μ-阿片受体拮抗剂。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jun 5;6(6):CD006332. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006332.pub3.
9
A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of topotecan for ovarian cancer.拓扑替康治疗卵巢癌的临床有效性和成本效益的快速系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(28):1-110. doi: 10.3310/hta5280.
10
Home treatment for mental health problems: a systematic review.心理健康问题的居家治疗:一项系统综述
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(15):1-139. doi: 10.3310/hta5150.

引用本文的文献

1
Neural cue-reactivity in pathological gambling as evidence for behavioral addiction: a systematic review.病理性赌博中神经线索反应性作为行为成瘾证据的系统评价
Curr Psychol. 2022 Nov 4:1-12. doi: 10.1007/s12144-022-03915-0.
2
Pharmacological interventions for the treatment of disordered and problem gambling.药物干预治疗障碍性及问题性赌博
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Sep 22;9(9):CD008936. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008936.pub2.
3
"A Theta Burst Stimulation on Pre-SMA: Proof-of-Concept of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in Gambling Disorder".

本文引用的文献

1
Naltrexone: A Pan-Addiction Treatment?纳曲酮:一种泛成瘾治疗方法?
CNS Drugs. 2016 Aug;30(8):719-33. doi: 10.1007/s40263-016-0373-0.
2
Evaluating the Impact of Naltrexone on the Rat Gambling Task to Test Its Predictive Validity for Gambling Disorder.评估纳曲酮对大鼠赌博任务的影响,以测试其对赌博障碍的预测效度。
PLoS One. 2016 May 18;11(5):e0155604. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0155604. eCollection 2016.
3
Interventions for comorbid problem gambling and psychiatric disorders: Advancing a developing field of research.针对共病问题赌博与精神疾病的干预措施:推动一个新兴研究领域的发展
“预 SMA 区θ爆发刺激:赌博障碍经颅磁刺激的概念验证”。
J Gambl Stud. 2022 Dec;38(4):1529-1537. doi: 10.1007/s10899-022-10129-3. Epub 2022 May 21.
4
Traumatic Stress-Induced Vulnerability to Addiction: Critical Role of the Dynorphin/Kappa Opioid Receptor System.创伤应激导致的成瘾易感性:强啡肽/κ阿片受体系统的关键作用。
Front Pharmacol. 2022 Apr 27;13:856672. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2022.856672. eCollection 2022.
5
Chronic Intermittent Sucrose Consumption Facilitates the Ability to Discriminate Opioid Receptor Blockade with Naltrexone in Rats.慢性间歇性蔗糖摄入促进大鼠对纳曲酮阻断阿片受体的辨别能力。
Nutrients. 2022 Feb 22;14(5):926. doi: 10.3390/nu14050926.
6
Possible effect of blonanserin on gambling disorder: A clinical study protocol and a case report.布南色林对赌博障碍的潜在影响:一项临床研究方案及一例病例报告。
World J Clin Cases. 2021 Apr 16;9(11):2469-2477. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v9.i11.2469.
7
Evaluation of Risk Behavior in Gambling Addicted and Opioid Addicted Individuals.对赌博成瘾者和阿片类药物成瘾者风险行为的评估。
Front Neurosci. 2021 Jan 7;14:597524. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2020.597524. eCollection 2020.
8
Is Subtyping of Gamblers Based on the Pathways Model of Problem and Disordered Gambling Valid? A Systematic Review.基于问题赌博和障碍性赌博的路径模型对赌徒进行细分是否有效?系统评价。
J Gambl Stud. 2021 Sep;37(3):983-1006. doi: 10.1007/s10899-020-09995-6. Epub 2021 Jan 1.
9
Both active and sham low-frequency rTMS single sessions over the right DLPFC decrease cue-induced cravings among pathological gamblers seeking treatment: A randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled crossover trial.右背外侧前额叶低频重复经颅磁刺激单次治疗可降低寻求治疗的病理性赌瘾者的线索诱发渴求:一项随机、双盲、假刺激对照交叉试验。
J Behav Addict. 2018 Mar 1;7(1):126-136. doi: 10.1556/2006.7.2018.14. Epub 2018 Feb 21.
10
Cognitive Remediation Interventions for Gambling Disorder: A Systematic Review.赌博障碍的认知矫正干预措施:一项系统综述
Front Psychol. 2017 Dec 4;8:1961. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01961. eCollection 2017.
Addict Behav. 2016 Jul;58:21-30. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2016.02.012. Epub 2016 Feb 10.
4
Opioid antagonists in broadly defined behavioral addictions: a narrative review.广义行为成瘾中的阿片类拮抗剂:一篇综述
Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2016;17(6):835-44. doi: 10.1517/14656566.2016.1145660. Epub 2016 Feb 27.
5
Pathological Gambling Associated With Aripiprazole or Dopamine Replacement Therapy: Do Patients Share the Same Features? A Review.与阿立哌唑或多巴胺替代疗法相关的病理性赌博:患者是否具有相同特征?一项综述。
J Clin Psychopharmacol. 2016 Feb;36(1):63-70. doi: 10.1097/JCP.0000000000000444.
6
A Randomised, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial of As-Needed Naltrexone in the Treatment of Pathological Gambling.按需服用纳曲酮治疗病理性赌博的随机、双盲、安慰剂对照试验
Eur Addict Res. 2016;22(2):70-9. doi: 10.1159/000435876. Epub 2015 Sep 5.
7
Treatment of cocaine craving with as-needed nalmefene, a partial κ opioid receptor agonist: first clinical experience.按需使用纳美芬(一种κ阿片受体部分激动剂)治疗可卡因渴求:首例临床经验。
Int Clin Psychopharmacol. 2015 Jul;30(4):237-8. doi: 10.1097/YIC.0000000000000069.
8
Update on the Pharmacological Treatment of Pathological Gambling.病理性赌博的药物治疗进展
Curr Psychopharmacol. 2013;2(3):204-211. doi: 10.2174/22115560113029990008.
9
Alleviating waiting impulsivity and perseverative responding by μ-opioid receptor antagonism in two inbred mouse strains.通过μ-阿片受体拮抗作用减轻两种近交系小鼠的等待冲动和持续性反应。
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2015 Apr;232(8):1483-92. doi: 10.1007/s00213-014-3786-9. Epub 2014 Nov 8.
10
Reward pathway dysfunction in gambling disorder: A meta-analysis of functional magnetic resonance imaging studies.赌博障碍中的奖赏通路功能障碍:功能磁共振成像研究的荟萃分析
Behav Brain Res. 2014 Dec 15;275:243-51. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2014.08.057. Epub 2014 Sep 6.