• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项关于阿片类拮抗剂纳曲酮治疗病理性赌博冲动的双盲、安慰剂对照研究。

A double-blind, placebo-controlled study of the opiate antagonist naltrexone in the treatment of pathological gambling urges.

作者信息

Grant Jon E, Kim Suck Won, Hartman Boyd K

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, University of Minnesota School of Medicine, Minneapolis, MN 55454, USA.

出版信息

J Clin Psychiatry. 2008 May;69(5):783-9. doi: 10.4088/jcp.v69n0511.

DOI:10.4088/jcp.v69n0511
PMID:18384246
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Pathological gambling (PG) is a disabling disorder experienced by approximately 1% of adults and for which few empirically validated treatments exist. This study examined the efficacy and tolerability of the opioid antagonist naltrexone in adults with PG who have urges to gamble.

METHOD

An 18-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial was conducted to evaluate the safety and efficacy of 3 doses of oral naltrexone for PG. Seventy-seven individuals with DSM-IV-TR PG were randomly assigned to naltrexone (50 mg/day, 100 mg/day, or 150 mg/day) or placebo. Subjects were assessed with the Pathological Gambling Adaptation of the Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale (PG-YBOCS), the urge and behavior subscales of the PG-YBOCS, the Gambling Symptom Assessment Scale (G-SAS), the Clinical Global Impressions-Severity of Illness scale (CGI-S), and measures of depression, anxiety, and psychosocial functioning. Data were collected from September 2002 to June 2005.

RESULTS

Outcomes did not significantly differ between the various doses of naltrexone. Subjects assigned to naltrexone had significantly greater reductions in PG-YBOCS total scores (p = .0094), gambling urges (p = .0053), and gambling behavior (p = .0134) compared to subjects assigned to placebo. Subjects assigned to naltrexone also had greater improvement in overall gambling severity (reflected in the CGI-S scores) (p = .0080) and in psychosocial functioning (p = .0177) than subjects assigned to placebo. A complete analysis (N = 49) demonstrated significantly greater improvement on all variables for subjects assigned to naltrexone. A sex analysis demonstrated that men and women did not differ significantly in their response to naltrexone.

CONCLUSION

Subjects assigned to naltrexone demonstrated statistically significant reductions in gambling urges and behavior in PG. Low-dose naltrexone (50 mg/day) appeared as efficacious as higher doses (100 mg/day and 150 mg/day), and all doses were well tolerated.

摘要

目的

病理性赌博(PG)是一种使约1%的成年人深受其害的疾病,而针对该病的经实证验证的治疗方法很少。本研究考察了阿片类拮抗剂纳曲酮对有赌博冲动的成年PG患者的疗效和耐受性。

方法

开展了一项为期18周的双盲、安慰剂对照试验,以评估3种剂量口服纳曲酮治疗PG的安全性和疗效。77名符合《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第四版修订版(DSM-IV-TR)PG诊断标准的个体被随机分配至纳曲酮组(50毫克/天、100毫克/天或150毫克/天)或安慰剂组。使用耶鲁-布朗强迫量表病理性赌博适应性版本(PG-YBOCS)、PG-YBOCS的冲动和行为分量表、赌博症状评估量表(G-SAS)、临床总体印象-疾病严重程度量表(CGI-S)以及抑郁、焦虑和社会心理功能测量工具对受试者进行评估。数据收集时间为2002年9月至2005年6月。

结果

不同剂量的纳曲酮之间的结果没有显著差异。与分配至安慰剂组的受试者相比,分配至纳曲酮组的受试者在PG-YBOCS总分(p = 0.0094)、赌博冲动(p = 0.0053)和赌博行为(p = 0.0134)方面有显著更大程度的降低。与分配至安慰剂组的受试者相比,分配至纳曲酮组的受试者在总体赌博严重程度(反映在CGI-S评分中)(p = 0.0080)和社会心理功能(p = 0.0177)方面也有更大改善。一项完整分析(N = 49)表明,分配至纳曲酮组的受试者在所有变量上的改善都显著更大。一项性别分析表明,男性和女性对纳曲酮的反应没有显著差异。

结论

分配至纳曲酮组的受试者在PG中的赌博冲动和行为有统计学上的显著降低。低剂量纳曲酮(50毫克/天)似乎与高剂量(100毫克/天和150毫克/天)一样有效,且所有剂量的耐受性都良好。

相似文献

1
A double-blind, placebo-controlled study of the opiate antagonist naltrexone in the treatment of pathological gambling urges.一项关于阿片类拮抗剂纳曲酮治疗病理性赌博冲动的双盲、安慰剂对照研究。
J Clin Psychiatry. 2008 May;69(5):783-9. doi: 10.4088/jcp.v69n0511.
2
A double-blind, placebo-controlled study of the opiate antagonist, naltrexone, in the treatment of kleptomania.一项关于阿片类拮抗剂纳曲酮治疗偷窃癖的双盲、安慰剂对照研究。
Biol Psychiatry. 2009 Apr 1;65(7):600-6. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2008.11.022. Epub 2009 Feb 12.
3
Multicenter investigation of the opioid antagonist nalmefene in the treatment of pathological gambling.纳美芬治疗病理性赌博的多中心研究。
Am J Psychiatry. 2006 Feb;163(2):303-12. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.163.2.303.
4
Double-blind naltrexone and placebo comparison study in the treatment of pathological gambling.双盲纳曲酮与安慰剂治疗病理性赌博的对比研究。
Biol Psychiatry. 2001 Jun 1;49(11):914-21. doi: 10.1016/s0006-3223(01)01079-4.
5
Predicting response to opiate antagonists and placebo in the treatment of pathological gambling.预测阿片类拮抗剂和安慰剂在病理性赌博治疗中的反应。
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2008 Nov;200(4):521-7. doi: 10.1007/s00213-008-1235-3. Epub 2008 Jun 26.
6
A Randomised, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial of As-Needed Naltrexone in the Treatment of Pathological Gambling.按需服用纳曲酮治疗病理性赌博的随机、双盲、安慰剂对照试验
Eur Addict Res. 2016;22(2):70-9. doi: 10.1159/000435876. Epub 2015 Sep 5.
7
Nefazodone treatment of pathological gambling: a prospective open-label controlled trial.奈法唑酮治疗病理性赌博:一项前瞻性开放标签对照试验。
J Clin Psychiatry. 2002 Nov;63(11):1034-9. doi: 10.4088/jcp.v63n1114.
8
Olanzapine in the treatment of pathological gambling: a negative randomized placebo-controlled trial.奥氮平治疗病理性赌博:一项阴性随机安慰剂对照试验。
J Clin Psychiatry. 2008 Mar;69(3):433-40. doi: 10.4088/jcp.v69n0314.
9
The Gambling Symptom Assessment Scale (G-SAS): a reliability and validity study.赌博症状评估量表(G-SAS):一项信效度研究。
Psychiatry Res. 2009 Mar 31;166(1):76-84. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2007.11.008. Epub 2009 Feb 5.
10
An open naltrexone treatment study in pathological gambling disorder.一项关于病理性赌博障碍的纳曲酮开放治疗研究。
Int Clin Psychopharmacol. 2001 Sep;16(5):285-9. doi: 10.1097/00004850-200109000-00006.

引用本文的文献

1
Hostages to Social Networks and Mental Health.社交网络与心理健康的人质
Sao Paulo Med J. 2025 Mar 31;143(2):e20251432. doi: 10.1590/1516-3180.2025.1432.13122024.
2
Neurotransmitters crosstalk and regulation in the reward circuit of subjects with behavioral addiction.行为成瘾受试者奖赏回路中的神经递质相互作用与调节
Front Psychiatry. 2025 Jan 14;15:1439727. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1439727. eCollection 2024.
3
A familial subtype of gambling disorder.一种家族性赌博障碍亚型。
J Behav Addict. 2024 Aug 13;13(3):761-767. doi: 10.1556/2006.2024.00042. Print 2024 Oct 4.
4
Duration of untreated illness in gambling disorder.赌博障碍未治疗疾病的持续时间。
CNS Spectr. 2024 Feb;29(1):54-59. doi: 10.1017/S1092852923002444. Epub 2023 Sep 11.
5
Individual strategies in the rat gambling task are related to voluntary alcohol intake, but not sexual behavior, and can be modulated by naltrexone.大鼠赌博任务中的个体策略与自愿酒精摄入量有关,但与性行为无关,且可被纳曲酮调节。
Front Psychiatry. 2022 Dec 8;13:931241. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.931241. eCollection 2022.
6
Brief Virtual Workshop on Gambling Disorder to Raise Knowledge and Awareness Among Health Service Providers.简短的赌博障碍虚拟研讨会,旨在提高卫生服务提供者的知识和意识。
J Gambl Stud. 2024 Mar;40(1):1-20. doi: 10.1007/s10899-022-10176-w. Epub 2022 Dec 20.
7
"Death drive" scientifically reconsidered: Not a drive but a collection of trauma-induced auto-addictive diseases.“死亡驱力”的科学再思考:并非一种驱力,而是一组创伤诱发的自我成瘾性疾病。
Front Psychol. 2022 Sep 28;13:941328. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.941328. eCollection 2022.
8
Pharmacological interventions for the treatment of disordered and problem gambling.药物干预治疗障碍性及问题性赌博
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Sep 22;9(9):CD008936. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008936.pub2.
9
FOXN3 and GDNF Polymorphisms as Common Genetic Factors of Substance Use and Addictive Behaviors.FOXN3和GDNF基因多态性作为物质使用和成瘾行为的常见遗传因素
J Pers Med. 2022 Apr 26;12(5):690. doi: 10.3390/jpm12050690.
10
"A Theta Burst Stimulation on Pre-SMA: Proof-of-Concept of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in Gambling Disorder".“预 SMA 区θ爆发刺激:赌博障碍经颅磁刺激的概念验证”。
J Gambl Stud. 2022 Dec;38(4):1529-1537. doi: 10.1007/s10899-022-10129-3. Epub 2022 May 21.