Fuchs Victor R, Emanuel Ezekiel J
Stanford University in Stanford, California, USA.
Health Aff (Millwood). 2005 Nov-Dec;24(6):1399-414. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.24.6.1399.
Dissatisfaction with the U.S. health care system is widespread, but no consensus has emerged as to how to reform it. The principal methods of finance-employer-based insurance, means-tested insurance, and Medicare-are deeply and irreparably flawed. Policymakers confront two fundamental questions: Should reform be incremental or comprehensive? And should priority be given to reforming the financing system or to improving organization and delivery? We consider here several proposals for incremental reform and three for comprehensive reform: individual mandates with subsidies, single payer, and universal vouchers. Over the long term, reform is likely to come in response to a major war, depression, or large-scale civil unrest.
对美国医疗保健系统的不满普遍存在,但对于如何改革该系统尚未达成共识。主要的融资方式——基于雇主的保险、收入调查型保险和医疗保险——存在严重且无法弥补的缺陷。政策制定者面临两个基本问题:改革应该是渐进式的还是全面的?以及应该优先改革融资系统还是改善组织与服务提供?我们在此考虑几项渐进式改革提案和三项全面改革提案:有补贴的个人强制参保、单一支付者制度和普遍代金券制度。从长远来看,改革可能会因一场大战、经济萧条或大规模内乱而出现。